Falsifiability Test for Classical Nucleation Theory

Classical nucleation theory (CNT) is built upon the capillarity approximation, i.e., the assumption that the nucleation properties can be inferred from the bulk properties of the melt and the crystal. Although the simplicity and usefulness of CNT cannot be overstated, experiments and simulations regularly uncover significant deviations from its predictions, which are often reconciled through phenomenological extensions of the CNT, fueling the debate over the general validity of the theory. In this Letter, we present a falsifiability test for any nucleation theory grounded in the capillarity approximation. We focus on cases where the theory predicts no differences in nucleation rates between different crystal polymorphs. We then introduce a system in which all polymorphs have the same free energy (both bulk and interfacial) across all state points. Through extensive molecular simulations, we show that the polymorphs exhibit remarkably different nucleation properties, directly contradicting predictions of CNT. We argue that CNT's primary limitation lies in its neglect of structural fluctuations within the liquid phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Letters
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.134.148201
Citations
4
Primary Topic
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Falsifiability Test for Classical Nucleation Theory

John Russo, Diogo E. P. Pinto, Lorenzo Rovigatti, Camilla Beneduce et al.
4 citations
Physical Review Letters
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
5.20
article

Falsifiability Test for Classical Nucleation Theory

John Russo, Diogo E. P. Pinto, Lorenzo Rovigatti, Camilla Beneduce, Francesco Sciortino, Petr Šulc, Flavio Romano
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Classical nucleation theory (CNT) is built upon the capillarity approximation, i.e., the assumption that the nucleation properties can be inferred from the bulk properties of the melt and the crystal. Although the simplicity and usefulness of CNT cannot be overstated, experiments and simulations regularly uncover significant deviations from its predictions, which are often reconciled through phenomenological extensions of the CNT, fueling the debate over the general validity of the theory. In this Letter, we present a falsifiability test for any nucleation theory grounded in the capillarity approximation. We focus on cases where the theory predicts no differences in nucleation rates between different crystal polymorphs. We then introduce a system in which all polymorphs have the same free energy (both bulk and interfacial) across all state points. Through extensive molecular simulations, we show that the polymorphs exhibit remarkably different nucleation properties, directly contradicting predictions of CNT. We argue that CNT's primary limitation lies in its neglect of structural fluctuations within the liquid phase.

Physical Review LettersVol. 134(14)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT), Arizona State University (US), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
U.S. Department of Energy, International Council of Shopping Centers Educational Foundation, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Basic Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
5.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.