Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph

Abstract The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has stimulated researchers to seek effective and efficient approaches to deal with LLM hallucinations and low-quality outputs. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a key element of machine learning applications in dealing with such challenges. However, research to date on UQ for LLMs has been fragmented in terms of techniques and evaluation methodologies. In this work, we address this issue by introducing a novel benchmark that implements a collection of state-of-the-art UQ baselines and offers an environment for controllable and consistent evaluation of novel UQ techniques over various text generation tasks. Our benchmark also supports the assessment of confidence normalization methods in terms of their ability to provide interpretable scores. Using our benchmark, we conduct a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across eleven tasks, identifying the most effective approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00737
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph

Preslav Nakov, Akim Tsvigun, Alexander Panchenko, Roman Vashurin et al.
6 citations
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Topic Modeling
14.89
article

Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph

Preslav Nakov, Akim Tsvigun, Alexander Panchenko, Roman Vashurin, Maxim Panov, Artem Vazhentsev, Sergey Petrakov, Artem Shelmanov, Abdelrahman Sadallah, Rui Xing, Lyudmila Rvanova, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Timothy Baldwin, Daniil Vasilev, Kirill Grishchenkov
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract The rapid proliferation of large language models (LLMs) has stimulated researchers to seek effective and efficient approaches to deal with LLM hallucinations and low-quality outputs. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a key element of machine learning applications in dealing with such challenges. However, research to date on UQ for LLMs has been fragmented in terms of techniques and evaluation methodologies. In this work, we address this issue by introducing a novel benchmark that implements a collection of state-of-the-art UQ baselines and offers an environment for controllable and consistent evaluation of novel UQ techniques over various text generation tasks. Our benchmark also supports the assessment of confidence normalization methods in terms of their ability to provide interpretable scores. Using our benchmark, we conduct a large-scale empirical investigation of UQ and normalization techniques across eleven tasks, identifying the most effective approaches.

Transactions of the Association for Computational LinguisticsVol. 13
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), The University of Melbourne (AU), ETH Zurich (CH), Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (AE), Yandex (Russia) (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Topic Modeling
14.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.