A Hybrid MPSI-Extended AROMAN Decision-making Model for Assessing Green Logistics Performance: The Case of Asia-Pacific Countries

Background: This study examines the green logistics performance of Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam) using nine criteria: climate change, environmental health, ecosystem vitality, customs, infrastructure, international shipments, logistics competences and quality, timeliness, and tracking and tracing. The criteria were determined based on a literature review. Data were obtained from Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) reports. Methods: This study combines the Modified Preference Selection Index (MPSI) and the Extended Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for the Two-Step Normalization (AROMAN) model to assess the green logistics performance of Asia-Pacific countries. The criteria weights were calculated using the MPSI method, while countries' green logistics performance was evaluated using the Extended AROMAN method. Results: The MPSI results show that environmental health, climate change, and infrastructure are the most important criteria, while tracking and tracing, international shipments, and timeliness are the least important. The Extended AROMAN results show that Japan, Australia, Singapore, New Zealand, and South Korea have the highest green logistics performance. In contrast, Indonesia, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cambodia, and Laos have the lowest green logistics performance. Sensitivity and comparative analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Conclusion: This study presents a decision support system tailored to help the private sector, policymakers, and various stakeholders assess and improve nations' logistics performance, with a strong emphasis on green logistics. This model is a vital tool for analyzing key logistics metrics, promoting sustainable practices, and enabling informed decision-making to advance environmental responsibility and efficiency within logistics operations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Logforum
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17270/j.log.001154
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Hybrid MPSI-Extended AROMAN Decision-making Model for Assessing Green Logistics Performance: The Case of Asia-Pacific Countries

Emre Kadir Özekenci
4 citations
Logforum
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
8.91
article

A Hybrid MPSI-Extended AROMAN Decision-making Model for Assessing Green Logistics Performance: The Case of Asia-Pacific Countries

Emre Kadir Özekenci
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Background: This study examines the green logistics performance of Asia-Pacific countries (Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam) using nine criteria: climate change, environmental health, ecosystem vitality, customs, infrastructure, international shipments, logistics competences and quality, timeliness, and tracking and tracing. The criteria were determined based on a literature review. Data were obtained from Logistics Performance Index (LPI) and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) reports. Methods: This study combines the Modified Preference Selection Index (MPSI) and the Extended Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for the Two-Step Normalization (AROMAN) model to assess the green logistics performance of Asia-Pacific countries. The criteria weights were calculated using the MPSI method, while countries' green logistics performance was evaluated using the Extended AROMAN method. Results: The MPSI results show that environmental health, climate change, and infrastructure are the most important criteria, while tracking and tracing, international shipments, and timeliness are the least important. The Extended AROMAN results show that Japan, Australia, Singapore, New Zealand, and South Korea have the highest green logistics performance. In contrast, Indonesia, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Cambodia, and Laos have the lowest green logistics performance. Sensitivity and comparative analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Conclusion: This study presents a decision support system tailored to help the private sector, policymakers, and various stakeholders assess and improve nations' logistics performance, with a strong emphasis on green logistics. This model is a vital tool for analyzing key logistics metrics, promoting sustainable practices, and enabling informed decision-making to advance environmental responsibility and efficiency within logistics operations.

LogforumVol. 21(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Hybrid MPSI-Extended AROMAN Decision-making Model for Assessing Green Logistics Performance: The Case of Asia-Pacific Countries — Emre Kadir Özekenci · Logforum (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS