Calibration of DEM input parameters for simulation of the cohesive materials: Comparison of response surface method and machine learning models

This paper presents a methodology for calibrating discrete element method input parameters for simulating cohesive materials. The Plackett-Burman method was initially employed to identify the significant input parameters. Subsequently, the performances of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and random forest (RF) models for calibration were compared. The results demonstrated that the random forest model outperformed the two other models, achieving an RMSE of 1.89, an R-squared of 94 %, and an MAE of 1.63. The ANN model followed closely, with an RMSE of 3.12, an R-squared of 89 %, and an MAE of 2.18, while the RSM model exhibited lower performance with an RMSE of 6.84, an R-squared of 86 %, and an MAE of 5.41. This study presents a framework for enhancing the accuracy of DEM simulations. Finally, the robustness and adaptability of the calibration approach were demonstrated by applying calibrated parameters from one particle size to another. • Developed a novel method for calibration of DEM parameters of cohesive materials. • Used Plackett-Burman method to identify vital inputs needed for DEM calibration. • Compared performances of three calibration models: RSM, ANN, and RF. • Verified RF model's performance consistency across various particle sizes. • Emphasized the potential of using machine learning methods in the calibration of DEM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Particuology
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2025.03.018
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Granular flow and fluidized beds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Calibration of DEM input parameters for simulation of the cohesive materials: Comparison of response surface method and machine learning models

Farhad Ein‐Mozaffari, Behrooz Jadidi, Ali Lohi, Mohammadreza Ebrahimi
4 citations
Particuology
Granular flow and fluidized beds
5.34
article

Calibration of DEM input parameters for simulation of the cohesive materials: Comparison of response surface method and machine learning models

Farhad Ein‐Mozaffari, Behrooz Jadidi, Ali Lohi, Mohammadreza Ebrahimi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for calibrating discrete element method input parameters for simulating cohesive materials. The Plackett-Burman method was initially employed to identify the significant input parameters. Subsequently, the performances of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural networks (ANN), and random forest (RF) models for calibration were compared. The results demonstrated that the random forest model outperformed the two other models, achieving an RMSE of 1.89, an R-squared of 94 %, and an MAE of 1.63. The ANN model followed closely, with an RMSE of 3.12, an R-squared of 89 %, and an MAE of 2.18, while the RSM model exhibited lower performance with an RMSE of 6.84, an R-squared of 86 %, and an MAE of 5.41. This study presents a framework for enhancing the accuracy of DEM simulations. Finally, the robustness and adaptability of the calibration approach were demonstrated by applying calibrated parameters from one particle size to another. • Developed a novel method for calibration of DEM parameters of cohesive materials. • Used Plackett-Burman method to identify vital inputs needed for DEM calibration. • Compared performances of three calibration models: RSM, ANN, and RF. • Verified RF model's performance consistency across various particle sizes. • Emphasized the potential of using machine learning methods in the calibration of DEM.

ParticuologyVol. 100
University of Toronto (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Granular flow and fluidized beds
5.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.