Learning together, responding together: interprofessional learning enhancing emergency services collaboration

Purpose This study evaluates the impact of multidisciplinary learning on the confidence, preparedness, and collaborative skills of healthcare and emergency service professionals during a field training exercise. It aimed to assess improvements in communication, teamwork, and decision-making skills, as well as identify areas for further training. Design Conducted at the Charmhaven Rural Fire Service (RFS) Control Centre in August 2024, the exercise involved NSW Ambulance, RFS, the Volunteer Rescue Association, and the Central Coast Local Health District, including doctors and nurses. High-fidelity simulations of emergencies, like mass-casualty incidents, cardiac arrests, and trauma cases, were conducted. Quantitative and qualitative data from pre- and post-exercise surveys measured learning outcomes and participant perceptions. Findings Quantitative data indicated that 100% of participants reported increased knowledge, understanding and collaborative ability across agencies, with confidence in interprofessional collaboration rising from 85.7% to 93.5%. All participants expressed greater appreciation for the operational challenges faced by other agencies. A slight decrease in self-reported preparedness for real-life scenarios (91.1% pre-exercise vs. 85.5% post-exercise) suggested participants recognised personal skill or knowledge gaps. Qualitative responses highlighted teamwork, communication, and cross-agency understanding as primary learning outcomes, though challenges in comprehending agency-specific protocols were also noted. Research Implications This study underscores the role of interprofessional learning (IPL) in bridging theoretical knowledge and practical skills for emergency response. Future research should integrate objective assessments of skill acquisition and improved evaluation engagement strategies. Practical Implications The results suggest IPL should be a regular practice to enhance collaboration and patient outcomes. Addressing training gaps, securing funding, and improving engagement in evaluations are recommended. Value This study supports IPL as essential for enhancing patient outcomes and fostering cohesive emergency responses. Limitations The study’s reliance on self-reported data may introduce bias, and the lack of objective skill assessment suggests further alignment in training content is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Education in Practice Journal of Research for Professional Learning
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33966/hepj.8.1.20380
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning together, responding together: interprofessional learning enhancing emergency services collaboration

Hina Patel, Natalie Govind, Kimberley J. Davis, Annabelle MacLellan et al.
1 citations
Health Education in Practice Journal of Research for Professional Learning
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.82
article

Learning together, responding together: interprofessional learning enhancing emergency services collaboration

Hina Patel, Natalie Govind, Kimberley J. Davis, Annabelle MacLellan, Greg Kerrison-Watkin, Graham Andrews
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study evaluates the impact of multidisciplinary learning on the confidence, preparedness, and collaborative skills of healthcare and emergency service professionals during a field training exercise. It aimed to assess improvements in communication, teamwork, and decision-making skills, as well as identify areas for further training. Design Conducted at the Charmhaven Rural Fire Service (RFS) Control Centre in August 2024, the exercise involved NSW Ambulance, RFS, the Volunteer Rescue Association, and the Central Coast Local Health District, including doctors and nurses. High-fidelity simulations of emergencies, like mass-casualty incidents, cardiac arrests, and trauma cases, were conducted. Quantitative and qualitative data from pre- and post-exercise surveys measured learning outcomes and participant perceptions. Findings Quantitative data indicated that 100% of participants reported increased knowledge, understanding and collaborative ability across agencies, with confidence in interprofessional collaboration rising from 85.7% to 93.5%. All participants expressed greater appreciation for the operational challenges faced by other agencies. A slight decrease in self-reported preparedness for real-life scenarios (91.1% pre-exercise vs. 85.5% post-exercise) suggested participants recognised personal skill or knowledge gaps. Qualitative responses highlighted teamwork, communication, and cross-agency understanding as primary learning outcomes, though challenges in comprehending agency-specific protocols were also noted. Research Implications This study underscores the role of interprofessional learning (IPL) in bridging theoretical knowledge and practical skills for emergency response. Future research should integrate objective assessments of skill acquisition and improved evaluation engagement strategies. Practical Implications The results suggest IPL should be a regular practice to enhance collaboration and patient outcomes. Addressing training gaps, securing funding, and improving engagement in evaluations are recommended. Value This study supports IPL as essential for enhancing patient outcomes and fostering cohesive emergency responses. Limitations The study’s reliance on self-reported data may introduce bias, and the lack of objective skill assessment suggests further alignment in training content is needed.

Health Education in Practice Journal of Research for Professional LearningVol. 8(1)
NSW Ambulance (AU), University of Wollongong (AU), Central Coast Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.