Surprise Impacts on Infrastructure Resilience: A Case Study of Hurricane Florence and Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune

A common way to improve infrastructure resilience is to surge resources for temporary organizing (e.g., manpower, equipment, and funding) at disaster-impacted locations to protect and recover failed systems. Yet, the increasing frequency and impacts of natural disasters appear to be causing unexpected damage to infrastructure, even in locations that may have significant emergency response capabilities like military installations. We argue that a key contributor to these failures is whether natural disasters cause surprise or not. We define surprise as an event that contradicts established beliefs, which can lead to ineffective use of resources for temporary organizing and impact infrastructure resilience. To substantiate this claim, we develop a method that relates surprise to measures of infrastructure resilience and conduct a case study on the destructive 2018 storm Hurricane Florence to assess temporary organizing efforts at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCBCL). Our analysis focuses on recovery efforts to manage failures in MCBCL sewer, training ground, school, and mission-essential infrastructure. We find each system experienced varying degrees of surprise that influenced temporary organizing. Specifically, results show when expectations diverged from reality, how long surprise remained unresolved, and whether events should be categorized as situational or fundamental surprise. Results also show the type surprise (i.e., situational or fundamental) and length it remains unresolved has a negative impact on the effectiveness of resources for temporary organizing. Overall, this study advances the temporary organizing literature by showing the differences in capabilities between civilian and military entities, the infrastructure resilience literature by developing new analysis methods for studying surprise, and military installation operations by providing practical recommendations on how to improve resource allocation for future disasters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2025.3556568
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surprise Impacts on Infrastructure Resilience: A Case Study of Hurricane Florence and Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune

Daniel A. Eisenberg, Emily A. Pesicka
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.95
article

Surprise Impacts on Infrastructure Resilience: A Case Study of Hurricane Florence and Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune

Daniel A. Eisenberg, Emily A. Pesicka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A common way to improve infrastructure resilience is to surge resources for temporary organizing (e.g., manpower, equipment, and funding) at disaster-impacted locations to protect and recover failed systems. Yet, the increasing frequency and impacts of natural disasters appear to be causing unexpected damage to infrastructure, even in locations that may have significant emergency response capabilities like military installations. We argue that a key contributor to these failures is whether natural disasters cause surprise or not. We define surprise as an event that contradicts established beliefs, which can lead to ineffective use of resources for temporary organizing and impact infrastructure resilience. To substantiate this claim, we develop a method that relates surprise to measures of infrastructure resilience and conduct a case study on the destructive 2018 storm Hurricane Florence to assess temporary organizing efforts at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune (MCBCL). Our analysis focuses on recovery efforts to manage failures in MCBCL sewer, training ground, school, and mission-essential infrastructure. We find each system experienced varying degrees of surprise that influenced temporary organizing. Specifically, results show when expectations diverged from reality, how long surprise remained unresolved, and whether events should be categorized as situational or fundamental surprise. Results also show the type surprise (i.e., situational or fundamental) and length it remains unresolved has a negative impact on the effectiveness of resources for temporary organizing. Overall, this study advances the temporary organizing literature by showing the differences in capabilities between civilian and military entities, the infrastructure resilience literature by developing new analysis methods for studying surprise, and military installation operations by providing practical recommendations on how to improve resource allocation for future disasters.

IEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementVol. 72
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), Naval Postgraduate School (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.