Improving ChatGPT’s Performance in Orthopedics: Opportunities Using the CRISPE Framework

ChatGPT has been increasingly used in clinical practice, education, and research. In orthopedic research, ChatGPT's accuracy in clinical decision-making has been a major concern, with results ranging from 33% to 80% accuracy. Inaccuracies from ChatGPT can be harmful to clinicians, trainees, or patients when responses appear plausible, are trusted, and acted upon. A critical limitation in orthopedic research is the lack of structured prompt engineering, which significantly impacts ChatGPT's performance. The CRISPE (Capacity/Role, Insight, Statement, Personality, Experiment) framework offers a systematic approach to refining prompts and improving response accuracy. This Viewpoint applies the CRISPE framework to recent orthopedic research and highlights opportunities to optimize prompts in ChatGPT. While research is needed to validate and refine prompt engineering tools in orthopedics, these methods have the potential to enhance the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT's responses and serve as valuable tools in orthopedic practice, education, and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOSPT Methods
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2519/josptmethods.2025.0151
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving ChatGPT’s Performance in Orthopedics: Opportunities Using the CRISPE Framework

Mark Vorensky, Richard A. Ferraro, Daniel Peredo, Smita Rao et al.
1 citations
JOSPT Methods
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Improving ChatGPT’s Performance in Orthopedics: Opportunities Using the CRISPE Framework

Mark Vorensky, Richard A. Ferraro, Daniel Peredo, Smita Rao, Emily Paris, Asma Mohammadi, Paul Spano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ChatGPT has been increasingly used in clinical practice, education, and research. In orthopedic research, ChatGPT's accuracy in clinical decision-making has been a major concern, with results ranging from 33% to 80% accuracy. Inaccuracies from ChatGPT can be harmful to clinicians, trainees, or patients when responses appear plausible, are trusted, and acted upon. A critical limitation in orthopedic research is the lack of structured prompt engineering, which significantly impacts ChatGPT's performance. The CRISPE (Capacity/Role, Insight, Statement, Personality, Experiment) framework offers a systematic approach to refining prompts and improving response accuracy. This Viewpoint applies the CRISPE framework to recent orthopedic research and highlights opportunities to optimize prompts in ChatGPT. While research is needed to validate and refine prompt engineering tools in orthopedics, these methods have the potential to enhance the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT's responses and serve as valuable tools in orthopedic practice, education, and research.

JOSPT MethodsVol. 1(2)
Rusk Rehabilitation (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving ChatGPT’s Performance in Orthopedics: Opportunities Using the CRISPE Framework — Mark Vorensky, Richard A. Ferraro, et al. · JOSPT Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS