Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among people in treatment for substance use disorders

Abstract Background: Comorbidities found high rates of psychiatric comorbidity among people with substance use disorders. Mood and anxiety disorders are the most frequent. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for a clinical sample of people with a drug addiction diagnosis. Method: 513 outpatients from two public health services for substance abuse treatment participated in this study. To assess the construct validity in our sample, we used a confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA), comparing two previous versions of CES-D that had evidence of validity for other Brazilian populations. Divergent and convergent validity was evaluated using Pearson's correlation test. Reliability coefficients were calculated by Cronbach's alpha (α) and average split-half test. Results: A four dimensions structure fitted well to our data with a better performance. Convergent validity was supported by a moderate positive correlation between CES-D factors and self-stigma. Divergent validity was supported by a negative moderated correlation with hope and self-esteem. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of our proposed model supports the use of CES-D to evaluate depression symptoms among people in treatment for substance use disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cadernos Saúde Coletiva
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x202433010461
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among people in treatment for substance use disorders

Telmo Mota Ronzani, Kimber P. Richter, Pollyanna Santos da Silveira, Leonardo Fernandes Martins et al.
1 links
Cadernos Saúde Coletiva
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among people in treatment for substance use disorders

Telmo Mota Ronzani, Kimber P. Richter, Pollyanna Santos da Silveira, Leonardo Fernandes Martins, Ana Luísa Marlière Casela
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Comorbidities found high rates of psychiatric comorbidity among people with substance use disorders. Mood and anxiety disorders are the most frequent. Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for a clinical sample of people with a drug addiction diagnosis. Method: 513 outpatients from two public health services for substance abuse treatment participated in this study. To assess the construct validity in our sample, we used a confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA), comparing two previous versions of CES-D that had evidence of validity for other Brazilian populations. Divergent and convergent validity was evaluated using Pearson's correlation test. Reliability coefficients were calculated by Cronbach's alpha (α) and average split-half test. Results: A four dimensions structure fitted well to our data with a better performance. Convergent validity was supported by a moderate positive correlation between CES-D factors and self-stigma. Divergent validity was supported by a negative moderated correlation with hope and self-esteem. Conclusions: The psychometric properties of our proposed model supports the use of CES-D to evaluate depression symptoms among people in treatment for substance use disorders.

Cadernos Saúde ColetivaVol. 33(1)
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), University of Kansas (US), Universidade Salgado de Oliveira (BR), Universidade Católica de Petrópolis (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.