Postoperative Outcomes of Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Objective: To compare outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with either low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP <12 mm Hg) or standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP >12 mm Hg). Methodology: This randomized trial was conducted over six months, from September 2020 to March 2021, with data prospectively collected from patients. Patients aged 20-60 years with symptomatic gallstones were divided between Group A or Group B randomly, with 31 patients in each group. Group A underwent surgery with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP), whereas Group B underwent surgery with standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP). Postoperative ileus was assessed at six hours, while shoulder tip pain was evaluated at 24 hours post-surgery, and comparisons were made between both groups. Results: There were 16 males and 15 females in group A and 14 males and 17 females in group B. Mean age in Group A was 40.35±7.27 years and in Group B 42.28±6.95 years. Group A had an average hospital stay of 1.06 ± 0.21 days and Group B had 1.09 ± 0.37 days. 10 patients (32.3%) experienced right shoulder tip pain in the LPP group as compared to 19 patients (61.3%) in the SPP group (p=0.021). Paralytic ileus was noticed in 6 patients (19.4%) in Group A and 16 patients (51.6%) in Group B (p<0.007). Conclusion: LLP is a possible and safe option that significantly reduces postoperative shoulder tip pain and paralytic ileus, facilitating earlier bowel recovery compared to standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v21i1.1088
Primary Topic
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Outcomes of Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Tashfeen Imtiaz, Sadia Shakoor, Aatif Inam, Erum Najeeb et al.
Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
article

Postoperative Outcomes of Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Tashfeen Imtiaz, Sadia Shakoor, Aatif Inam, Erum Najeeb, Muhammad Asad, Ibad Ur Rehman, Muhammad Burhan ul Haq
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with either low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP <12 mm Hg) or standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP >12 mm Hg). Methodology: This randomized trial was conducted over six months, from September 2020 to March 2021, with data prospectively collected from patients. Patients aged 20-60 years with symptomatic gallstones were divided between Group A or Group B randomly, with 31 patients in each group. Group A underwent surgery with low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP), whereas Group B underwent surgery with standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP). Postoperative ileus was assessed at six hours, while shoulder tip pain was evaluated at 24 hours post-surgery, and comparisons were made between both groups. Results: There were 16 males and 15 females in group A and 14 males and 17 females in group B. Mean age in Group A was 40.35±7.27 years and in Group B 42.28±6.95 years. Group A had an average hospital stay of 1.06 ± 0.21 days and Group B had 1.09 ± 0.37 days. 10 patients (32.3%) experienced right shoulder tip pain in the LPP group as compared to 19 patients (61.3%) in the SPP group (p=0.021). Paralytic ileus was noticed in 6 patients (19.4%) in Group A and 16 patients (51.6%) in Group B (p<0.007). Conclusion: LLP is a possible and safe option that significantly reduces postoperative shoulder tip pain and paralytic ileus, facilitating earlier bowel recovery compared to standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum.

Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical UniversityVol. 21(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Abdominal Surgery and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.