The Spanish version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form: Establishing measurement invariance across sexual orientation.

The Dual Control Model (DCM) conceptualizes sexual response as the result of integrating two neurophysiological systems (excitatory and inhibitory), where psychological, physiological, and behavioral factors are involved. Regarding DCM-derived measures, few studies have included sexual minority participants. Therefore, the present study aimed to provide additional validity evidence in bisexual and gay populations of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form (SIS/SES-SF), a widely used scale derived from the DCM. The measurement invariance by sexual orientation of the SIS/SES-SF was analyzed, its scores were compared, and its relationship with sexual functioning was examined. 9,290 men and women were assessed between January 2022 and June 2023. They were classified into bisexual, gay, and heterosexual individuals. Results showed strict measurement invariance of SIS/SES-SF by sexual orientation in women, and weak/metric measurement invariance in men. Bisexual and gay men reported more propensity for sexual excitation and sexual inhibition than heterosexual men, although these differences should be cautiously taken since the scale does not reach the maximum level of invariance. Furthermore, bisexual women indicated more propensity for sexual excitation and less sexual inhibition due to sexual consequences than heterosexual and lesbian women. Heterosexual women reported the highest sexual inhibition due to sexual performance failure. Scores on the SIS/SES-SF subscales were significantly related to sexual functioning, especially sexual arousal and lubrication/erection. This study provides researchers and clinicians with an assessment instrument that provides reliable and valid measures to examine the propensity for sexual excitation/inhibition of bisexual and gay people; moreover, in the case of women, it allows comparison of bisexuals, heterosexuals, and lesbians.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000832
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Spanish version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form: Establishing measurement invariance across sexual orientation.

Laura Elvira Muñoz-García, Óscar Cervilla, Pablo Mangas, Juan Carlos Sierra
4 citations
Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
6.92
article

The Spanish version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form: Establishing measurement invariance across sexual orientation.

Laura Elvira Muñoz-García, Óscar Cervilla, Pablo Mangas, Juan Carlos Sierra
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The Dual Control Model (DCM) conceptualizes sexual response as the result of integrating two neurophysiological systems (excitatory and inhibitory), where psychological, physiological, and behavioral factors are involved. Regarding DCM-derived measures, few studies have included sexual minority participants. Therefore, the present study aimed to provide additional validity evidence in bisexual and gay populations of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales-Short Form (SIS/SES-SF), a widely used scale derived from the DCM. The measurement invariance by sexual orientation of the SIS/SES-SF was analyzed, its scores were compared, and its relationship with sexual functioning was examined. 9,290 men and women were assessed between January 2022 and June 2023. They were classified into bisexual, gay, and heterosexual individuals. Results showed strict measurement invariance of SIS/SES-SF by sexual orientation in women, and weak/metric measurement invariance in men. Bisexual and gay men reported more propensity for sexual excitation and sexual inhibition than heterosexual men, although these differences should be cautiously taken since the scale does not reach the maximum level of invariance. Furthermore, bisexual women indicated more propensity for sexual excitation and less sexual inhibition due to sexual consequences than heterosexual and lesbian women. Heterosexual women reported the highest sexual inhibition due to sexual performance failure. Scores on the SIS/SES-SF subscales were significantly related to sexual functioning, especially sexual arousal and lubrication/erection. This study provides researchers and clinicians with an assessment instrument that provides reliable and valid measures to examine the propensity for sexual excitation/inhibition of bisexual and gay people; moreover, in the case of women, it allows comparison of bisexuals, heterosexuals, and lesbians.

Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
European Social Fund
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
6.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.