Creativity and irrelevance processing: Evidence from online eye tracking.

Processing nominally irrelevant information has been linked to successful creative ideation, especially in open-minded individuals. To investigate attentional processing, prior studies in this field relied on in- laboratory eye tracking. Despite several advantages, this method also comes with downsides like high costs and slow data collection. To address these issues, online, webcam-based eye tracking might be a prom- ising solution. In three preregistered experiments, we transferred an established paradigm from in-laboratory research to the online context. Participants (N = 100 for each study) had to come up with possible uses for visually presented items, which were surrounded by nominally irrelevant distractor objects. Between exper- iments, we manipulated the kind of these distractor items (Study 1: real objects; Study 2: real objects for half of the trials and random geometric figures for the other half; Study 3: random geometric figures). In line with prior in-laboratory research, in Study 1 and in the real objects condition in Study 2, we found a positive rela- tion of the time processing this nominally irrelevant information and the originality of the produced uses. For the random geometric figures condition of Study 2 and in Study 3, no such relation was found. We conclude that irrelevance processing only promotes creativity if the additional information is somehow related to the given task and can thus stimulate novel ideas. In contrast, simply shifting the visual focus away from a task might not be sufficient to facilitate creative thinking. We discuss the potential and limitations of online web- cam-based eye tracking for creativity research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000756
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creativity and irrelevance processing: Evidence from online eye tracking.

Wilfried Kunde, Moritz Reis, Sergio Agnoli
Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Creativity and irrelevance processing: Evidence from online eye tracking.

Wilfried Kunde, Moritz Reis, Sergio Agnoli
article en

Abstract

Processing nominally irrelevant information has been linked to successful creative ideation, especially in open-minded individuals. To investigate attentional processing, prior studies in this field relied on in- laboratory eye tracking. Despite several advantages, this method also comes with downsides like high costs and slow data collection. To address these issues, online, webcam-based eye tracking might be a prom- ising solution. In three preregistered experiments, we transferred an established paradigm from in-laboratory research to the online context. Participants (N = 100 for each study) had to come up with possible uses for visually presented items, which were surrounded by nominally irrelevant distractor objects. Between exper- iments, we manipulated the kind of these distractor items (Study 1: real objects; Study 2: real objects for half of the trials and random geometric figures for the other half; Study 3: random geometric figures). In line with prior in-laboratory research, in Study 1 and in the real objects condition in Study 2, we found a positive rela- tion of the time processing this nominally irrelevant information and the originality of the produced uses. For the random geometric figures condition of Study 2 and in Study 3, no such relation was found. We conclude that irrelevance processing only promotes creativity if the additional information is somehow related to the given task and can thus stimulate novel ideas. In contrast, simply shifting the visual focus away from a task might not be sufficient to facilitate creative thinking. We discuss the potential and limitations of online web- cam-based eye tracking for creativity research.

Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.