Algorithm to Identify Type 2 Diabetes Using Electronic Health Record and Self-Reported Data

<b><i>Aims:</i></b> Identifying participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) based only on electronic health record (EHR) or self-reported data has limited accuracy. Therefore, the objective of the study was to develop an algorithm using EHR and self-reported data to identify participants with and without T2D. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Biobank. At enrollment, participants completed a baseline questionnaire on health conditions, including T2D, and provided access to their EHR data. T2D status was based on self-report and EHR data (International Classification of Diseases codes, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], plasma glucose, and glucose-regulating medications) within 5 years prior to and 2 months after enrollment. Participants who self-reported T2D but lacked corroborating EHR data were categorized separately ("only self-reported T2D"). After identifying participants with T2D, we identified participants without T2D based on normal HbA1c and plasma glucose. Participants who self-reported the absence of T2D but lacked corroborating EHR data were categorized separately ("only self-reported no T2D"). Using manual chart reviews (gold standard), we calculated the positive and negative predictive values (NPV) to identify T2D. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 57,000 participants, the algorithm classified participants as having T2D (<i>n</i> = 6,238), no T2D (<i>n</i> = 38,883), "only self-reported T2D" (<i>n</i> = 757), and "only self-reported no-T2D" (<i>n</i> = 9,759). The algorithm had a high positive predictive value (96.0% [91.5%-98.5%]), NPV (100% [98.0%-100%]), and accuracy (99.5% [98.3%-99.8%]). Participant age (median [range]) ranged from 52 (18-98) years (only self-reported T2D) to 67 (19-99) years (T2D) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and the proportion of women ranged from 45.3% (T2D) to 69.6% (only self-reported no T2D) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Most participants were of the White race (84.0%-92.7%) and non-Hispanic ethnicity (97.6%-98.6%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, we developed an algorithm to accurately identify participants with and without T2D, which may be generalizable to cohorts with linked EHR data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2024.0133
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithm to Identify Type 2 Diabetes Using Electronic Health Record and Self-Reported Data

Marlene Girardo, Adrian Vella, Kent R. Bailey, Sagar B. Dugani et al.
Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Algorithm to Identify Type 2 Diabetes Using Electronic Health Record and Self-Reported Data

Marlene Girardo, Adrian Vella, Kent R. Bailey, Sagar B. Dugani, Aoife M. Egan, Karen M. Fischer, Janet E. Olson, Michelle M. Mielke, Ruchi Gupta, Ben Varghese, Madison Duellman
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Aims:</i></b> Identifying participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) based only on electronic health record (EHR) or self-reported data has limited accuracy. Therefore, the objective of the study was to develop an algorithm using EHR and self-reported data to identify participants with and without T2D. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We included participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Biobank. At enrollment, participants completed a baseline questionnaire on health conditions, including T2D, and provided access to their EHR data. T2D status was based on self-report and EHR data (International Classification of Diseases codes, hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], plasma glucose, and glucose-regulating medications) within 5 years prior to and 2 months after enrollment. Participants who self-reported T2D but lacked corroborating EHR data were categorized separately ("only self-reported T2D"). After identifying participants with T2D, we identified participants without T2D based on normal HbA1c and plasma glucose. Participants who self-reported the absence of T2D but lacked corroborating EHR data were categorized separately ("only self-reported no T2D"). Using manual chart reviews (gold standard), we calculated the positive and negative predictive values (NPV) to identify T2D. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 57,000 participants, the algorithm classified participants as having T2D (<i>n</i> = 6,238), no T2D (<i>n</i> = 38,883), "only self-reported T2D" (<i>n</i> = 757), and "only self-reported no-T2D" (<i>n</i> = 9,759). The algorithm had a high positive predictive value (96.0% [91.5%-98.5%]), NPV (100% [98.0%-100%]), and accuracy (99.5% [98.3%-99.8%]). Participant age (median [range]) ranged from 52 (18-98) years (only self-reported T2D) to 67 (19-99) years (T2D) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), and the proportion of women ranged from 45.3% (T2D) to 69.6% (only self-reported no T2D) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Most participants were of the White race (84.0%-92.7%) and non-Hispanic ethnicity (97.6%-98.6%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this study, we developed an algorithm to accurately identify participants with and without T2D, which may be generalizable to cohorts with linked EHR data.

Metabolic Syndrome and Related DisordersVol. 23(4)
Mayo Clinic (US), Saint Francis Hospital (US), St. Francis Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.