Mixed teaching quality evaluation of organizational behavior course based on CIPP model

Introduction The implementation of blended learning helps overcome the limitations of traditional “chalk-and-talk” didactic teaching and unidirectional passive learning, demonstrating significant value in cultivating students’ problem-solving skills, critical thinking, and enhancing instructional quality. However, there remains a lack of systematic evaluation frameworks for assessing blended learning quality in discipline-specific courses (e.g., Organizational Behavior). Methods This study developed a blended teaching quality evaluation system based on the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model, comprising four first-level indicators (context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, and product evaluation) and sixteen second-level indicators, along with defining a five-level course performance rating set S (very low, low, medium, high, very high). Using the organizational behavior course repository from a public university in Henan Province as the sample, empirical analysis was conducted employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Results Empirical results indicate the course’s blended learning quality achieved an overall “High” rating. The AHP method not only effectively evaluates teaching quality but also identifies specific issues in teacher-student interactions through indicator analysis. Discussion The proposed CIPP-AHP integrated framework provides a practical diagnostic solution for blended learning quality (supported by 2023 data). Its indicator system and grading criteria are generalizable to similar courses, offering referential value for optimizing instructional design and teacher professional development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1538539
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Educational Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mixed teaching quality evaluation of organizational behavior course based on CIPP model

Sujun Zhang, Binbin Yang, Lifen Bai
2 citations
Frontiers in Education
Innovative Educational Techniques
17.85
article

Mixed teaching quality evaluation of organizational behavior course based on CIPP model

Sujun Zhang, Binbin Yang, Lifen Bai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction The implementation of blended learning helps overcome the limitations of traditional “chalk-and-talk” didactic teaching and unidirectional passive learning, demonstrating significant value in cultivating students’ problem-solving skills, critical thinking, and enhancing instructional quality. However, there remains a lack of systematic evaluation frameworks for assessing blended learning quality in discipline-specific courses (e.g., Organizational Behavior). Methods This study developed a blended teaching quality evaluation system based on the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model, comprising four first-level indicators (context evaluation, input evaluation, process evaluation, and product evaluation) and sixteen second-level indicators, along with defining a five-level course performance rating set S (very low, low, medium, high, very high). Using the organizational behavior course repository from a public university in Henan Province as the sample, empirical analysis was conducted employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Results Empirical results indicate the course’s blended learning quality achieved an overall “High” rating. The AHP method not only effectively evaluates teaching quality but also identifies specific issues in teacher-student interactions through indicator analysis. Discussion The proposed CIPP-AHP integrated framework provides a practical diagnostic solution for blended learning quality (supported by 2023 data). Its indicator system and grading criteria are generalizable to similar courses, offering referential value for optimizing instructional design and teacher professional development.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Xuchang University (CN)
Xuchang University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovative Educational Techniques
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.