Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor hand area can assess corticomotor function in humans by evoking motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). Paired-pulse TMS at peri-threshold intensity elicits short-latency intracortical facilitation (SICF) with early peaks at interpulse intervals of 1.0-1.8 ms (SICF<sub>1</sub>) and 2.4-3 ms (SICF<sub>2</sub>). The similarity between the periodicity of SICF and indirect (I-)waves in the corticospinal volleys evoked by single-pulse TMS suggests that SICF originates from I-wave generating circuits. This study aimed to explore the mechanisms of MEP generation by mapping the corticomotor representations of single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS targeting SICF<sub>1</sub> and SICF<sub>2</sub> peaks. We performed central sulcus shape-based, robot-assisted and neuro-navigated motor maps in 14 participants (7 females). MEPs were recorded from two hand muscles and the spatial properties of each corticomotor map were analyzed. For both hand muscles, we found a consistent posterior shift of the center of gravity (CoG) for SICF maps compared with single-pulse maps, with a larger shift for SICF<sub>1</sub>. CoG displacement in the SICF<sub>1</sub> map correlated with individual SICF<sub>1</sub> latencies. Furthermore, abductor digiti minimi (ADM) maps consistently peaked more medially than first dorsal interosseus (FDI) maps and paired-pulse TMS resulted in larger corticomotor maps than single-pulse TMS. This is the first study to show that circuits responsible for SICF have a more posterior representation in the precentral crown than those generating MEPs via single-pulse TMS. These findings indicate that paired-pulse TMS probing SICF<sub>1</sub>, SICF<sub>2</sub>, and single-pulse TMS engage overlapping but spatially distinct cortical circuits, adding further insights into the intricate organization of the human motor hand area.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used to study corticomotor physiology in humans, but do they engage the same intracortical circuits? We compared the spatial properties of corticomotor maps elicited by single-pulse TMS to those elicited by paired-pulse short-latency intracortical facilitation (SICF). SICF maps consistently showed a posterior shift in center of gravity compared with single-pulse maps, suggesting that paired-pulse TMS engages cortical circuits that are spatially distinct from single-pulse TMS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00459.2024
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex

Morten G. Jønsson, Hartwig Roman Siebner, Mads Alexander Just Madsen, Chloe Lau Ha Chung et al.
5 citations
Journal of Neurophysiology
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
7.16
article

Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex

Morten G. Jønsson, Hartwig Roman Siebner, Mads Alexander Just Madsen, Chloe Lau Ha Chung, Lasse Christiansen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor hand area can assess corticomotor function in humans by evoking motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). Paired-pulse TMS at peri-threshold intensity elicits short-latency intracortical facilitation (SICF) with early peaks at interpulse intervals of 1.0-1.8 ms (SICF<sub>1</sub>) and 2.4-3 ms (SICF<sub>2</sub>). The similarity between the periodicity of SICF and indirect (I-)waves in the corticospinal volleys evoked by single-pulse TMS suggests that SICF originates from I-wave generating circuits. This study aimed to explore the mechanisms of MEP generation by mapping the corticomotor representations of single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS targeting SICF<sub>1</sub> and SICF<sub>2</sub> peaks. We performed central sulcus shape-based, robot-assisted and neuro-navigated motor maps in 14 participants (7 females). MEPs were recorded from two hand muscles and the spatial properties of each corticomotor map were analyzed. For both hand muscles, we found a consistent posterior shift of the center of gravity (CoG) for SICF maps compared with single-pulse maps, with a larger shift for SICF<sub>1</sub>. CoG displacement in the SICF<sub>1</sub> map correlated with individual SICF<sub>1</sub> latencies. Furthermore, abductor digiti minimi (ADM) maps consistently peaked more medially than first dorsal interosseus (FDI) maps and paired-pulse TMS resulted in larger corticomotor maps than single-pulse TMS. This is the first study to show that circuits responsible for SICF have a more posterior representation in the precentral crown than those generating MEPs via single-pulse TMS. These findings indicate that paired-pulse TMS probing SICF<sub>1</sub>, SICF<sub>2</sub>, and single-pulse TMS engage overlapping but spatially distinct cortical circuits, adding further insights into the intricate organization of the human motor hand area.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used to study corticomotor physiology in humans, but do they engage the same intracortical circuits? We compared the spatial properties of corticomotor maps elicited by single-pulse TMS to those elicited by paired-pulse short-latency intracortical facilitation (SICF). SICF maps consistently showed a posterior shift in center of gravity compared with single-pulse maps, suggesting that paired-pulse TMS engages cortical circuits that are spatially distinct from single-pulse TMS.

Journal of NeurophysiologyVol. 133(5)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Amager Hospital (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Innovationsfonden, Lundbeckfonden, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
7.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.