Intense rift magmatism caused rapid thickening of Yilgarn Craton crust at 2.7 Ga

• Crust thickness and density for the Yilgarn Craton is resolved by gravity inversion. • Crustal thickening is reconstructed for contractional and extensional scenarios. • Magma-dominated rifting between 2.73 to 2.69 Ga best explains observed thickening. • Rapid Neoarchean crustal thickening enabled by crossing thermo-rheological thresholds. • Global crustal thickness evolution explained by a series of similarly-sized events. The crustal structure of many Archean cratons fits a paradigm of relatively thin crust (< 35 km), with felsic compositions, low-velocity lower crust and a sharp Moho discontinuity. This contrasts with the crusts of Proterozoic regions, which are typified by thicker crust (> 40 km), often with a high-velocity lower crust and a diffuse Moho. A global-scale transition in the nature of the crust is suggested, but its timing and nature remain unclear. The Yilgarn Craton in Western Australia has crustal thickness from ∼ 30 km to > 45 km and may preserve a key example of this transition. This study employs seismic-constrained gravity inversion to resolve in detail the thickness and density of the Yilgarn Craton crust. Regions with thick and dense crust are identified, and we explore two scenarios for their development: scenario 1 involves crustal shortening, erosion, and the development of a garnet-bearing lower crust, and scenario 2 involves addition of mafic magmatic rocks during extension. Scenario 2 is more consistent with the Neoarchean geology of the craton and the inferred extents of juvenile magmatism between 2.73 to 2.65 Ga. A regional stratigraphic unconformity at ca. 2.73 Ga is recognised as a turning point in the evolution of the craton, marking the crossing of thermo-rheological thresholds for geodynamically-stable lower crust. We suggest that net crustal thickening occurred over the next ∼40 Ma with a mafic magmatic input totalling 5.0 Mkm 3 balanced by moderate extension (β-factor ∼ 1.1) Monte-Carlo simulations use a time-and-space distributed series of events of <40 Ma duration and <10 MKm 3 vol to successfully explain modelled variations in global average crustal thickness through time. The event identified here aligns with a peak in constructive tendency, supporting the diachronous and episodic growth of the global lower crust during the Neoarchean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119336
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intense rift magmatism caused rapid thickening of Yilgarn Craton crust at 2.7 Ga

Quentin Masurel, Lu Li, Nicolas Thébaud, Alan Aitken et al.
1 citations
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
1.87
article

Intense rift magmatism caused rapid thickening of Yilgarn Craton crust at 2.7 Ga

Quentin Masurel, Lu Li, Nicolas Thébaud, Alan Aitken, Abdul Azim bin Rossalim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Crust thickness and density for the Yilgarn Craton is resolved by gravity inversion. • Crustal thickening is reconstructed for contractional and extensional scenarios. • Magma-dominated rifting between 2.73 to 2.69 Ga best explains observed thickening. • Rapid Neoarchean crustal thickening enabled by crossing thermo-rheological thresholds. • Global crustal thickness evolution explained by a series of similarly-sized events. The crustal structure of many Archean cratons fits a paradigm of relatively thin crust (< 35 km), with felsic compositions, low-velocity lower crust and a sharp Moho discontinuity. This contrasts with the crusts of Proterozoic regions, which are typified by thicker crust (> 40 km), often with a high-velocity lower crust and a diffuse Moho. A global-scale transition in the nature of the crust is suggested, but its timing and nature remain unclear. The Yilgarn Craton in Western Australia has crustal thickness from ∼ 30 km to > 45 km and may preserve a key example of this transition. This study employs seismic-constrained gravity inversion to resolve in detail the thickness and density of the Yilgarn Craton crust. Regions with thick and dense crust are identified, and we explore two scenarios for their development: scenario 1 involves crustal shortening, erosion, and the development of a garnet-bearing lower crust, and scenario 2 involves addition of mafic magmatic rocks during extension. Scenario 2 is more consistent with the Neoarchean geology of the craton and the inferred extents of juvenile magmatism between 2.73 to 2.65 Ga. A regional stratigraphic unconformity at ca. 2.73 Ga is recognised as a turning point in the evolution of the craton, marking the crossing of thermo-rheological thresholds for geodynamically-stable lower crust. We suggest that net crustal thickening occurred over the next ∼40 Ma with a mafic magmatic input totalling 5.0 Mkm 3 balanced by moderate extension (β-factor ∼ 1.1) Monte-Carlo simulations use a time-and-space distributed series of events of <40 Ma duration and <10 MKm 3 vol to successfully explain modelled variations in global average crustal thickness through time. The event identified here aligns with a peak in constructive tendency, supporting the diachronous and episodic growth of the global lower crust during the Neoarchean.

Earth and Planetary Science LettersVol. 660
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Minerals Research Institute of Western Australia
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.