On the Fluid Behavior Response Characteristics During Early Stage of CBM Co-Production in Superimposed Pressure Systems: Insights from Experimental Analysis

The fluid disturbance effect is a significant challenge in CBM (CBM) co-production within superimposed pressure systems in China. To address the unique CBM reservoir of superimposed pressure systems, a CBM co-production experimental apparatus for multi-pressure systems has been independently developed. To comprehensively understand fluid behavior during the early stage of CBM co-production, two sets of experiments were conducted using the self-developed physical simulation test device: one in single-production mode and the other in co-production mode. The dynamic response of reservoir fluids and gas production characteristics were analyzed, and the fluid disturbance mechanism under wellbore fluid confluences was explored. The method adopted in this study addresses the issues of traditional co-production equipment, such as the use of series-parallel core holders, small dimensions, limited monitoring capabilities, single loading methods, and the lack of consideration for wellbore co-production flow disturbance and fluid redistribution in superimposed pressure systems. The following results were obtained: ① A flow disturbance effect emerges when fluids from coal reservoirs with different pressure properties converge and mix in a main wellbore. The pressure inside the four horizontal wells simultaneously reaches 1.45 MPa at t = 0.03 min. ② Based on the fluid disturbance effect, the evolution process of wellbore pressure is categorized into two stages: the confluence disturbance stage and the confluence pressure drop stage. ③ This fluid disturbance effect exacerbates the disparities among coal reservoirs, facilitating fluid exchange between the main wellbore and coal reservoirs through branch wellbores. Under the co-production mode, the instantaneous gas production of the No. 1 coal reservoir reaches its maximum negative value at the moment of production, amounting to −3.85 L/min, indicating that a portion of the fluid from high-pressure coal reservoirs flows back into low-pressure coal reservoirs. ④ A dynamic characterization compatibility method is proposed based on the differences in fluid flow between the single and co-production modes during the early stage of CBM production. For example, at t = 0.1 min, the pressure compatibility coefficients of the No. 1–4 coal reservoirs are 0.72, 0.45, 0.34, and 0.33, respectively. The pressure compatibility and production compatibility coefficients exhibit rapid growth during the early stages, followed by a slight decrease during the middle and later stages. ⑤ The worst compatibility performances are observed during the early stage of CBM co-production, but these performances improve as the co-production time extends. ⑥ Optimizing superimposed pressure systems involves progressive co-production: dynamically introducing coal reservoirs, balancing reservoir pressure, minimizing fluid disturbance, and enhancing recovery efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2025-04-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13041095
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Polymer Foaming and Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Fluid Behavior Response Characteristics During Early Stage of CBM Co-Production in Superimposed Pressure Systems: Insights from Experimental Analysis

Qixian Li, Meichang Zhang, Jun Ren, Peixian Yang et al.
1 citations
Processes
Polymer Foaming and Composites
0.61
article

On the Fluid Behavior Response Characteristics During Early Stage of CBM Co-Production in Superimposed Pressure Systems: Insights from Experimental Analysis

Qixian Li, Meichang Zhang, Jun Ren, Peixian Yang, Jiang Xu, Yang Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The fluid disturbance effect is a significant challenge in CBM (CBM) co-production within superimposed pressure systems in China. To address the unique CBM reservoir of superimposed pressure systems, a CBM co-production experimental apparatus for multi-pressure systems has been independently developed. To comprehensively understand fluid behavior during the early stage of CBM co-production, two sets of experiments were conducted using the self-developed physical simulation test device: one in single-production mode and the other in co-production mode. The dynamic response of reservoir fluids and gas production characteristics were analyzed, and the fluid disturbance mechanism under wellbore fluid confluences was explored. The method adopted in this study addresses the issues of traditional co-production equipment, such as the use of series-parallel core holders, small dimensions, limited monitoring capabilities, single loading methods, and the lack of consideration for wellbore co-production flow disturbance and fluid redistribution in superimposed pressure systems. The following results were obtained: ① A flow disturbance effect emerges when fluids from coal reservoirs with different pressure properties converge and mix in a main wellbore. The pressure inside the four horizontal wells simultaneously reaches 1.45 MPa at t = 0.03 min. ② Based on the fluid disturbance effect, the evolution process of wellbore pressure is categorized into two stages: the confluence disturbance stage and the confluence pressure drop stage. ③ This fluid disturbance effect exacerbates the disparities among coal reservoirs, facilitating fluid exchange between the main wellbore and coal reservoirs through branch wellbores. Under the co-production mode, the instantaneous gas production of the No. 1 coal reservoir reaches its maximum negative value at the moment of production, amounting to −3.85 L/min, indicating that a portion of the fluid from high-pressure coal reservoirs flows back into low-pressure coal reservoirs. ④ A dynamic characterization compatibility method is proposed based on the differences in fluid flow between the single and co-production modes during the early stage of CBM production. For example, at t = 0.1 min, the pressure compatibility coefficients of the No. 1–4 coal reservoirs are 0.72, 0.45, 0.34, and 0.33, respectively. The pressure compatibility and production compatibility coefficients exhibit rapid growth during the early stages, followed by a slight decrease during the middle and later stages. ⑤ The worst compatibility performances are observed during the early stage of CBM co-production, but these performances improve as the co-production time extends. ⑥ Optimizing superimposed pressure systems involves progressive co-production: dynamically introducing coal reservoirs, balancing reservoir pressure, minimizing fluid disturbance, and enhancing recovery efficiency.

ProcessesVol. 13(4)
Chongqing University (CN), Liaoning Technical University (CN), China Coal Research Institute (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Polymer Foaming and Composites
0.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.