Արդարադատության և դատական վերահսկողությանվարչադատավարական փոխհարաբերությունները

The article presents a deep and comprehensive analysis of the relationship between justice and judicial control within the framework of administrative judicial relations. First and foremost, the article addresses theoretical questions concerning the boundaries of justice and judicial control, as well as their methods of application. The main objective of the article is to demonstrate the role of justice and judicial control in the administrative proceedings of the Republic of Armenia and how they affect the legality of normative legal acts and the activities of administrative bodies. The work emphasizes that judicial control, as part of justice, is an important instrument in a legal state that ensures the legality of administrative decisions. It examines both direct and indirect forms of judicial control, describing their functional significance in administrative, criminal, and constitutional proceedings. Particular attention is given to judicial control over normative legal acts, noting that this process is crucial for ensuring legality in the realm of public administration. The article investigates how courts carry out the verification of the legality of normative legal acts and how this is reflected in the judicial practice of the Republic of Armenia. It also analyzes the interrelationship between administrative justice and procedures for imposing administrative liability, highlighting that administrative justice has its own characteristics that are significant in resolving disputes between administrative bodies and private individuals. The article further discusses the distinction between direct and indirect judicial control, identifying both abstract and concrete forms of control. Direct judicial control is viewed as the process of immediate verification of the legality of normative legal acts, while indirect control is exercised when the court is compelled to address the issue of legality in the context of a specific case. In the concluding section of the article, it is noted that justice and judicial control in administrative judicial relations have a clearly interconnected nature, which contributes to the development of a legal state and enhances the accountability of public authorities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Yerevan University C Jurisprudence
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46991/bysu.c/2024.15.2.105
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Արդարադատության և դատական վերահսկողությանվարչադատավարական փոխհարաբերությունները

Ռաֆիկ Խանդանյան
Bulletin of Yerevan University C Jurisprudence
European and International Law Studies
article

Արդարադատության և դատական վերահսկողությանվարչադատավարական փոխհարաբերությունները

Ռաֆիկ Խանդանյան
article en

Abstract

The article presents a deep and comprehensive analysis of the relationship between justice and judicial control within the framework of administrative judicial relations. First and foremost, the article addresses theoretical questions concerning the boundaries of justice and judicial control, as well as their methods of application. The main objective of the article is to demonstrate the role of justice and judicial control in the administrative proceedings of the Republic of Armenia and how they affect the legality of normative legal acts and the activities of administrative bodies. The work emphasizes that judicial control, as part of justice, is an important instrument in a legal state that ensures the legality of administrative decisions. It examines both direct and indirect forms of judicial control, describing their functional significance in administrative, criminal, and constitutional proceedings. Particular attention is given to judicial control over normative legal acts, noting that this process is crucial for ensuring legality in the realm of public administration. The article investigates how courts carry out the verification of the legality of normative legal acts and how this is reflected in the judicial practice of the Republic of Armenia. It also analyzes the interrelationship between administrative justice and procedures for imposing administrative liability, highlighting that administrative justice has its own characteristics that are significant in resolving disputes between administrative bodies and private individuals. The article further discusses the distinction between direct and indirect judicial control, identifying both abstract and concrete forms of control. Direct judicial control is viewed as the process of immediate verification of the legality of normative legal acts, while indirect control is exercised when the court is compelled to address the issue of legality in the context of a specific case. In the concluding section of the article, it is noted that justice and judicial control in administrative judicial relations have a clearly interconnected nature, which contributes to the development of a legal state and enhances the accountability of public authorities.

Bulletin of Yerevan University C JurisprudenceVol. 15(2 (41))
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.