Flow Pattern and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Analysis Around Tandem Piers: Insights from k-ε Modelling and Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry Measurements

This study investigated the distribution and dynamics of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) around a group of three tandem piers using a combination of numerical simulations and experimental measurements. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method, coupled with the k-ε turbulence model, was implemented in ANSYS FLUENT to replicate the free-surface flow conditions. An experimental validation was conducted using Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry (ADV) to assess the model’s capability at capturing the turbulence characteristics. While the model effectively reproduced the near-bed turbulence, it consistently underestimated the TKE magnitudes across the flow domain, particularly in regions of strong vortex-induced turbulence. Discrepancies emerged in the confined regions between the piers, where the velocity profiles were overestimated at the surface and underestimated near the bed and mid-depth, impacting the TKE predictions. Despite these inconsistencies, the general pattern of the TKE distribution aligned with the experimental trends, though the absolute values remained underestimated due to the inherent limitations of the k-ε model. The model’s performance in less turbulent regions demonstrated improved accuracy, reinforcing its applicability for moderate turbulence simulations. To further examine the interaction between vortex structures and the TKE, velocity distributions were analyzed at three specific depths (z/h = 0.15, 0.4, and 0.62). The findings showed the critical role of vortex shedding in TKE generation and dissipation, with notable variations in the turbulence intensity influenced by structural confinement effects. This study offers a novel, high-resolution evaluation of the k-ε model’s ability to predict TKE distributions around tandem piers, using spatially detailed comparisons with the experimental data. Unlike previous studies that broadly acknowledged the model’s limitations, this work systematically identifies the specific regions, particularly vortex-dominated zones, where its predictive accuracy significantly degrades.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17071100
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow Pattern and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Analysis Around Tandem Piers: Insights from k-ε Modelling and Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry Measurements

Saba Soori, Jaan H. Pu, Nima Ikani
4 citations
Water
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
6.87
article

Flow Pattern and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Analysis Around Tandem Piers: Insights from k-ε Modelling and Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry Measurements

Saba Soori, Jaan H. Pu, Nima Ikani
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the distribution and dynamics of the Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE) around a group of three tandem piers using a combination of numerical simulations and experimental measurements. The Volume of Fluid (VOF) method, coupled with the k-ε turbulence model, was implemented in ANSYS FLUENT to replicate the free-surface flow conditions. An experimental validation was conducted using Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry (ADV) to assess the model’s capability at capturing the turbulence characteristics. While the model effectively reproduced the near-bed turbulence, it consistently underestimated the TKE magnitudes across the flow domain, particularly in regions of strong vortex-induced turbulence. Discrepancies emerged in the confined regions between the piers, where the velocity profiles were overestimated at the surface and underestimated near the bed and mid-depth, impacting the TKE predictions. Despite these inconsistencies, the general pattern of the TKE distribution aligned with the experimental trends, though the absolute values remained underestimated due to the inherent limitations of the k-ε model. The model’s performance in less turbulent regions demonstrated improved accuracy, reinforcing its applicability for moderate turbulence simulations. To further examine the interaction between vortex structures and the TKE, velocity distributions were analyzed at three specific depths (z/h = 0.15, 0.4, and 0.62). The findings showed the critical role of vortex shedding in TKE generation and dissipation, with notable variations in the turbulence intensity influenced by structural confinement effects. This study offers a novel, high-resolution evaluation of the k-ε model’s ability to predict TKE distributions around tandem piers, using spatially detailed comparisons with the experimental data. Unlike previous studies that broadly acknowledged the model’s limitations, this work systematically identifies the specific regions, particularly vortex-dominated zones, where its predictive accuracy significantly degrades.

WaterVol. 17(7)
University of Bradford (GB), Semnan University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.