Trump watch: 23 states and 2000 scientists sue president over cuts, WHO budget crisis deepens, and more

The District of Columbia and 23 US states have launched legal action against President Donald Trump's administration after the cancellation of $11bn (8.54bn; 10bn) in public health funding left over from the covid pandemic. 1 The funding was being used in programmes tracking the spread of disease and vaccine rollouts, as well as addiction and mental health services and others.The lawsuit, which asks the court to immediately block the funding cut, says that the federal government did not provide a "rational basis" or facts to support the cuts.The attorney generals representing these states said that the move would lead to "serious harm to public health" and would put states "at greater risk for future pandemics and the spread of otherwise preventable disease and cutting off vital public health services."California's attorney general, Rob Bonta,

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r686
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trump watch: 23 states and 2000 scientists sue president over cuts, WHO budget crisis deepens, and more

Mun-Keat Looi
2 citations
BMJ
Health and Medical Research Impacts
3.76
article

Trump watch: 23 states and 2000 scientists sue president over cuts, WHO budget crisis deepens, and more

Mun-Keat Looi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The District of Columbia and 23 US states have launched legal action against President Donald Trump's administration after the cancellation of $11bn (8.54bn; 10bn) in public health funding left over from the covid pandemic. 1 The funding was being used in programmes tracking the spread of disease and vaccine rollouts, as well as addiction and mental health services and others.The lawsuit, which asks the court to immediately block the funding cut, says that the federal government did not provide a "rational basis" or facts to support the cuts.The attorney generals representing these states said that the move would lead to "serious harm to public health" and would put states "at greater risk for future pandemics and the spread of otherwise preventable disease and cutting off vital public health services."California's attorney general, Rob Bonta,

BMJVol. 389
BMJ Group (United Kingdom)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.