Gender-based ocean uses and values: Implications for marine spatial planning

Our study contributes to a more gender-sensitive approach to marine spatial planning, aiming for balanced, sustainable growth in the blue economy. It examined gendered ocean use patterns and their implications for equitable marine spatial planning. To document the distinct ways men and women interact with and value ocean spaces, we analyzed participatory mapping results from Ocean Use Surveys (OUS) conducted in three regions: the Maldives, the Azores, and Belize. The findings show that, globally, men dominate offshore activities like commercial fishing, whereas women’s activities are concentrated nearshore, often involving informal economic roles such as subsistence fishing, tourism, and cultural uses. Our analysis generated gender-specific heat maps highlighting areas of ocean use by sector and gender. This gender-disaggregated data revealed spatial and sectoral differences: in the Azores, women are more active in research and recreational fishing; in Belize, they engage in mariculture; and in the Maldives, they participate in more informal, small-scale, self-employed economies. We also addressed the gender gap in ocean data, a result of historic biases in data collection, which has led to undervaluing women’s contributions to the maritime economy and to gender-blind policies. The findings stress the need for gender-disaggregated data in marine planning to avoid exacerbating gender inequities and to ensure inclusive, effective policies. We recommend enhanced data practices that capture women’s oceanic contributions, advocating for mixed-gender survey teams and targeted outreach to reduce bias. Policymakers are encouraged to integrate these insights to support equitable marine governance, fostering inclusivity in ocean resource management. • In three regions studied, men and women use and value ocean space differently. • Ocean use surveys show men dominate offshore activities while women focus nearshore. • Gender-disaggregated data is vital for equitable, inclusive marine spatial planning. • Formalizing and valuing women’s nearshore roles can strengthen coastal economies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106691
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender-based ocean uses and values: Implications for marine spatial planning

Matthew R. Paufve, Brian M. Dixon, Fathimath Nistharan, Peter Menzies et al.
Marine Policy
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Gender-based ocean uses and values: Implications for marine spatial planning

Matthew R. Paufve, Brian M. Dixon, Fathimath Nistharan, Peter Menzies, Marinez Eymael García Scherer, Noemí Chacón, Adriano Quintela, Abigail Meyer, Sulzakimin Mohamed, Will McClintock, Andrew Estep, Jamani Balderamos
article en

Abstract

Our study contributes to a more gender-sensitive approach to marine spatial planning, aiming for balanced, sustainable growth in the blue economy. It examined gendered ocean use patterns and their implications for equitable marine spatial planning. To document the distinct ways men and women interact with and value ocean spaces, we analyzed participatory mapping results from Ocean Use Surveys (OUS) conducted in three regions: the Maldives, the Azores, and Belize. The findings show that, globally, men dominate offshore activities like commercial fishing, whereas women’s activities are concentrated nearshore, often involving informal economic roles such as subsistence fishing, tourism, and cultural uses. Our analysis generated gender-specific heat maps highlighting areas of ocean use by sector and gender. This gender-disaggregated data revealed spatial and sectoral differences: in the Azores, women are more active in research and recreational fishing; in Belize, they engage in mariculture; and in the Maldives, they participate in more informal, small-scale, self-employed economies. We also addressed the gender gap in ocean data, a result of historic biases in data collection, which has led to undervaluing women’s contributions to the maritime economy and to gender-blind policies. The findings stress the need for gender-disaggregated data in marine planning to avoid exacerbating gender inequities and to ensure inclusive, effective policies. We recommend enhanced data practices that capture women’s oceanic contributions, advocating for mixed-gender survey teams and targeted outreach to reduce bias. Policymakers are encouraged to integrate these insights to support equitable marine governance, fostering inclusivity in ocean resource management. • In three regions studied, men and women use and value ocean space differently. • Ocean use surveys show men dominate offshore activities while women focus nearshore. • Gender-disaggregated data is vital for equitable, inclusive marine spatial planning. • Formalizing and valuing women’s nearshore roles can strengthen coastal economies.

Marine PolicyVol. 178
Universidade dos Açores (PT), The Nature Conservancy (US), University of Lisbon (PT), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of Belize (BZ), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), The Ocean Foundation (US), Maldives National University (MV), The Nature Conservancy (CO), National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (US), San Diego Biomedical Research Institute (US)
Waitt Foundation, Nature Conservancy
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.