Predictors of political participation of U.S. social workers: the mediating effect of confidence

What factors are associated with social workers’ political participation, and how does political confidence mediate those relationships? To answer this question, data were collected in 2020 through an original online survey of members of the U.S.-based National Association of Social Workers (NASW). Informed by self-efficacy theory, researchers conducted a structural equation modeling (SEM) path model with political participation as the outcome variable, and political confidence as a mediating variable. Exogenous variables included: one’s self-reported political orientation, belief that social work has a political mandate, gender, and knowledge about how to effectively participate in politics. Results indicate that high political confidence is associated with political participation. Similarly, the belief that ‘the social work profession has a political mandate’ is positively related to political participation, both directly and indirectly through its positive association with confidence. This study suggests that political knowledge building in curriculum and programming, while necessary, does not sufficiently influence political participation. Instead, to support a politically engaged social work profession, social work educators and professional bodies ought to couple content about political knowledge with political practice in ways that realistically increase students’ political confidence and commitment to the idea that social workers are mandated to engage in politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Work Education
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2025.2484364
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of political participation of U.S. social workers: the mediating effect of confidence

Teresa Kilbane, Rachel Young, Maria V. Wathen, Amy Krings
1 citations
Social Work Education
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
article

Predictors of political participation of U.S. social workers: the mediating effect of confidence

Teresa Kilbane, Rachel Young, Maria V. Wathen, Amy Krings
article en
1 citations

Abstract

What factors are associated with social workers’ political participation, and how does political confidence mediate those relationships? To answer this question, data were collected in 2020 through an original online survey of members of the U.S.-based National Association of Social Workers (NASW). Informed by self-efficacy theory, researchers conducted a structural equation modeling (SEM) path model with political participation as the outcome variable, and political confidence as a mediating variable. Exogenous variables included: one’s self-reported political orientation, belief that social work has a political mandate, gender, and knowledge about how to effectively participate in politics. Results indicate that high political confidence is associated with political participation. Similarly, the belief that ‘the social work profession has a political mandate’ is positively related to political participation, both directly and indirectly through its positive association with confidence. This study suggests that political knowledge building in curriculum and programming, while necessary, does not sufficiently influence political participation. Instead, to support a politically engaged social work profession, social work educators and professional bodies ought to couple content about political knowledge with political practice in ways that realistically increase students’ political confidence and commitment to the idea that social workers are mandated to engage in politics.

Social Work EducationVol. 45(1)
Loyola University Chicago (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.