A System Safety Assessment Method Considering Risk Correlation

ABSTRACT The safety of the system is affected by a variety of risk factors such as human, machine, environment, and management, and the risk factors interact with each other and are not independent. Describing the dynamic trends in the operational safety of a system with coupled risk factors is difficult. Therefore, a safety assessment method based on the IOWA‐IM‐FCM model is proposed. Combining the interval‐ordered weighted average (IOWA) operator to build an interaction matrix (IM) of risk factors. It can better express the fuzzy relationship between risk factors while weakening the influence of subjective factors and identifying key risk factors. Next, the IM elements are substituted into the fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) model to predict the system safety risk trends under the influence of risk factor interactions. Finally, the results of the analysis of the IM and the FCM model are integrated, and the system safety evaluation level is determined by the risk evaluation coefficient. The method was applied to a case study of a bogie system. Results indicate the bogie system operation risk is general, matching the real scenario. The method realizes quantitative prediction of the system risk trend under the coupling of risk factors with certain advantages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.3776
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A System Safety Assessment Method Considering Risk Correlation

Shiqun Li, Yonghua Li, Shujian Liu, Zhiyang Zhang et al.
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

A System Safety Assessment Method Considering Risk Correlation

Shiqun Li, Yonghua Li, Shujian Liu, Zhiyang Zhang, Qing Xia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The safety of the system is affected by a variety of risk factors such as human, machine, environment, and management, and the risk factors interact with each other and are not independent. Describing the dynamic trends in the operational safety of a system with coupled risk factors is difficult. Therefore, a safety assessment method based on the IOWA‐IM‐FCM model is proposed. Combining the interval‐ordered weighted average (IOWA) operator to build an interaction matrix (IM) of risk factors. It can better express the fuzzy relationship between risk factors while weakening the influence of subjective factors and identifying key risk factors. Next, the IM elements are substituted into the fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) model to predict the system safety risk trends under the influence of risk factor interactions. Finally, the results of the analysis of the IM and the FCM model are integrated, and the system safety evaluation level is determined by the risk evaluation coefficient. The method was applied to a case study of a bogie system. Results indicate the bogie system operation risk is general, matching the real scenario. The method realizes quantitative prediction of the system risk trend under the coupling of risk factors with certain advantages.

Quality and Reliability Engineering InternationalVol. 41(5)
CRRC (China) (CN), Dalian Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A System Safety Assessment Method Considering Risk Correlation — Shiqun Li, Yonghua Li, et al. · Quality and Reliability Engineering International (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS