The Judiciary's Role in Promoting Free Trade: “A Focus on Inter-State Trade Disputes”

This article examines the critical role of judicial institutions in promoting and preserving free trade, with particular emphasis on inter-state trade disputes. Through analysis of landmark cases and jurisprudential trends across diverse jurisdictions, the article demonstrates how courts function as institutional safeguards against protectionism while balancing competing values of economic integration and regulatory autonomy.[3] The judiciary's multifaceted contributions include dismantling trade barriers, harmonizing regulatory frameworks, establishing predictable legal environments, and enhancing the legitimacy of free trade regimes.[4] Drawing on comparative perspectives from federal systems, regional trade blocs, and international tribunals, the article illuminates the dynamic interplay between judicial reasoning and economic policy.[5] While acknowledging the substantive challenges facing judicial actors—including institutional capacity constraints, conceptual limitations, and political pressures—the analysis suggests that courts remain essential, if sometimes imperfect, guardians of open markets.[6] The article concludes that effective judicial engagement with trade disputes requires both principled legal reasoning and contextual sensitivity to the complex political economy within which free trade operates.[7] [1] Schoolar in LLM Corporate Law [2] Assistant Professor, ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University, Dehradun [3] See, e.g., John H. Jackson, "The Role of the Judiciary in the WTO Legal Order," 1(1) J. Int'l Econ. L. 1 (1998). [4] Peter van den Bossche & Werner Zdouc, The Law, and Policy of the World Trade Organization (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017), at 101. [5] R.C. Batra, "Judicial Activism in Economic Policy: An Analysis of Trade Dispute Resolution," 12 Ind. J. Const. L. 45 (2015). [6] Alec Stone Sweet, "Judicialization and the Construction of Governance," 32 Comp. Pol. Stud. 147 (1999). [7] Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, "Multilevel Governance and Judicial Protection of Free Trade," 24 Eur. J. Int'l L. 597 (2013).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem43960
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Judiciary's Role in Promoting Free Trade: “A Focus on Inter-State Trade Disputes”

Suneel Kumar, Kumari Neha
INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
World Trade Organization Law
article

The Judiciary's Role in Promoting Free Trade: “A Focus on Inter-State Trade Disputes”

Suneel Kumar, Kumari Neha
article en

Abstract

This article examines the critical role of judicial institutions in promoting and preserving free trade, with particular emphasis on inter-state trade disputes. Through analysis of landmark cases and jurisprudential trends across diverse jurisdictions, the article demonstrates how courts function as institutional safeguards against protectionism while balancing competing values of economic integration and regulatory autonomy.[3] The judiciary's multifaceted contributions include dismantling trade barriers, harmonizing regulatory frameworks, establishing predictable legal environments, and enhancing the legitimacy of free trade regimes.[4] Drawing on comparative perspectives from federal systems, regional trade blocs, and international tribunals, the article illuminates the dynamic interplay between judicial reasoning and economic policy.[5] While acknowledging the substantive challenges facing judicial actors—including institutional capacity constraints, conceptual limitations, and political pressures—the analysis suggests that courts remain essential, if sometimes imperfect, guardians of open markets.[6] The article concludes that effective judicial engagement with trade disputes requires both principled legal reasoning and contextual sensitivity to the complex political economy within which free trade operates.[7] [1] Schoolar in LLM Corporate Law [2] Assistant Professor, ICFAI Law School, The ICFAI University, Dehradun [3] See, e.g., John H. Jackson, "The Role of the Judiciary in the WTO Legal Order," 1(1) J. Int'l Econ. L. 1 (1998). [4] Peter van den Bossche & Werner Zdouc, The Law, and Policy of the World Trade Organization (4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017), at 101. [5] R.C. Batra, "Judicial Activism in Economic Policy: An Analysis of Trade Dispute Resolution," 12 Ind. J. Const. L. 45 (2015). [6] Alec Stone Sweet, "Judicialization and the Construction of Governance," 32 Comp. Pol. Stud. 147 (1999). [7] Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, "Multilevel Governance and Judicial Protection of Free Trade," 24 Eur. J. Int'l L. 597 (2013).

INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENTVol. 09(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Judiciary's Role in Promoting Free Trade: “A Focus on Inter-State Trade Disputes” — Suneel Kumar, Kumari Neha · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS