Mark Rutte’s Role in the Fragmented Political System of the Netherlands

In the article, Dutch voters’ perception of the current party and political system of the country is analyzed, along with the role of Mark Rutte – the Dutch Prime Minister from 2010 until 2024 – in this system. Rutte leaving national politics serves as a turning point that allows a retrospective assessment of what paved the way to the success of Rutte’s People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy in four parliamentary elections (2010, 2012, 2017 and 2021). The author aims at identifying the favorable factors in Rutte’s and his party’s electoral victories. In the article, the genealogical historical method is used to outline the party system evolution in the Netherlands as a consociational democracy (according to A. Lijphart); various approaches to electoral research are also used, most importantly the ‘funnel of causality’ developed within the psychosocial approach. The author posits that, in the fragmented Dutch political system, voters’ view on party programs and politicians' personalities are increasingly important. In particular, the personality of a politician is crucial, as differences between the programs are getting blurry; the charismatic type of authority (according to M. Weber) is also playing a growing role. Using Dutch and international statistical data, sociological surveys, and Dutch expert analytics, the author concludes that economic situation in the country and Rutte’s perception as a ‘crisis manager’ have been the foremost determinants of trust in him as a prime minister. The latter factor has also played a significant role in the party victories in 2017 and 2021. The results of the four elections studied, however, were also influenced by other factors, such as adjustments made to the party’s proposed policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analysis and Forecasting IMEMO Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2025-1-46-60
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mark Rutte’s Role in the Fragmented Political System of the Netherlands

A. Posazhennikova
Analysis and Forecasting IMEMO Journal
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Mark Rutte’s Role in the Fragmented Political System of the Netherlands

A. Posazhennikova
article en

Abstract

In the article, Dutch voters’ perception of the current party and political system of the country is analyzed, along with the role of Mark Rutte – the Dutch Prime Minister from 2010 until 2024 – in this system. Rutte leaving national politics serves as a turning point that allows a retrospective assessment of what paved the way to the success of Rutte’s People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy in four parliamentary elections (2010, 2012, 2017 and 2021). The author aims at identifying the favorable factors in Rutte’s and his party’s electoral victories. In the article, the genealogical historical method is used to outline the party system evolution in the Netherlands as a consociational democracy (according to A. Lijphart); various approaches to electoral research are also used, most importantly the ‘funnel of causality’ developed within the psychosocial approach. The author posits that, in the fragmented Dutch political system, voters’ view on party programs and politicians' personalities are increasingly important. In particular, the personality of a politician is crucial, as differences between the programs are getting blurry; the charismatic type of authority (according to M. Weber) is also playing a growing role. Using Dutch and international statistical data, sociological surveys, and Dutch expert analytics, the author concludes that economic situation in the country and Rutte’s perception as a ‘crisis manager’ have been the foremost determinants of trust in him as a prime minister. The latter factor has also played a significant role in the party victories in 2017 and 2021. The results of the four elections studied, however, were also influenced by other factors, such as adjustments made to the party’s proposed policies.

Analysis and Forecasting IMEMO Journal(1)
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU), Institute of World Economy and International Relations (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.