Quantitative Methodology for Assessing the Quality of Direct Laser Processing of 316L Steel Powder Using Type I and Type II Control Errors

The paper proposes a methodology for assessing the quality of the direct laser melting process of 316L steel powder, which was tested when creating products in a construction furnace of the EOSINT M280 system at different laser powers. The methodology for evaluating the quality of the laser melting process is based on measuring the melting temperature of 316L steel powder using an infrared camera, assessing the expanded uncertainty of temperature measurements, and calculating the probabilities of the temperature falling within the established confidence limits based on type I and type II control errors (risks). The experimental investigations revealed that the melting temperature of 316L steel powder was achieved at a laser power of 195 W, with an average value of 1446 °C. It was also found that the maximum expanded measurement uncertainty for the temperature was 7%. In this case, an identification of quality indicators of the laser melting process is proposed, which has three levels: good quality (A), satisfactory quality (B), and unsatisfactory/unacceptable quality (C). The studies showed that the probability of achieving a good/high-quality (A) resulted in the laser melting process of 316L steel powder at a laser power of 195 W was 91%, while the probability of achieving satisfactory quality (B) was 0.03%. These findings contribute to enhancing in situ process monitoring in additive manufacturing, enabling the detection of deviations and adjustments to ensure consistently good quality. The proposed methodology provides a robust framework applicable across different LP-BF/M systems, improving process reliability and reproducibility in industrial and scientific applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071476
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Methodology for Assessing the Quality of Direct Laser Processing of 316L Steel Powder Using Type I and Type II Control Errors

Michael Cullinan, Matthew Jones, Oleksandr Vasilevskyi, A. Edwin Woods
1 citations
Electronics
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

Quantitative Methodology for Assessing the Quality of Direct Laser Processing of 316L Steel Powder Using Type I and Type II Control Errors

Michael Cullinan, Matthew Jones, Oleksandr Vasilevskyi, A. Edwin Woods
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper proposes a methodology for assessing the quality of the direct laser melting process of 316L steel powder, which was tested when creating products in a construction furnace of the EOSINT M280 system at different laser powers. The methodology for evaluating the quality of the laser melting process is based on measuring the melting temperature of 316L steel powder using an infrared camera, assessing the expanded uncertainty of temperature measurements, and calculating the probabilities of the temperature falling within the established confidence limits based on type I and type II control errors (risks). The experimental investigations revealed that the melting temperature of 316L steel powder was achieved at a laser power of 195 W, with an average value of 1446 °C. It was also found that the maximum expanded measurement uncertainty for the temperature was 7%. In this case, an identification of quality indicators of the laser melting process is proposed, which has three levels: good quality (A), satisfactory quality (B), and unsatisfactory/unacceptable quality (C). The studies showed that the probability of achieving a good/high-quality (A) resulted in the laser melting process of 316L steel powder at a laser power of 195 W was 91%, while the probability of achieving satisfactory quality (B) was 0.03%. These findings contribute to enhancing in situ process monitoring in additive manufacturing, enabling the detection of deviations and adjustments to ensure consistently good quality. The proposed methodology provides a robust framework applicable across different LP-BF/M systems, improving process reliability and reproducibility in industrial and scientific applications.

ElectronicsVol. 14(7)
Walker (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.