Cognitive Aspects of Adults and Older Adults with Hearing Loss, Users or not of Hearing Aids: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Evaluate cognitive aspects in adults and older adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids, compared to those with hearing loss who do not use hearing aids. Research Strategies: A systematic search across seven databases and gray literature until May 10, 2022, sought studies of individuals aged >18 with hearing loss. Selection Criteria: Both interventional and observational analytical studies were included, without language or publication date restrictions. Data Analysis: Seven articles were included, revealing a correlation between cognitive aspects, hearing loss, and hearing aid use in adults and older adults.Comparisons were made between hearing aid users and non-users usingvalidated cognitive questionnaires. Risk of bias assessment was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Assessment Checklist, followed by random effects meta-analysis. The GRADE tool determined certainty of evidence. Results: Hearing aid usersexhibited improved Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) performance (MD = -1.47; CI95% = -2.53 - - 0.40; I2 = 7.21%), albeit with low certainty. Conclusion: While MMSE results indicated possible cognitive benefits for adults and older adults using hearing aids, the evidence remains uncertain. Developing a comprehensive psychological assessment tool encompassing language, memory, attention, executive functions, and socialization is recommended to ensure accurate evaluations of this population’s health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34257/gjhssgvol25is2pg1
Primary Topic
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Aspects of Adults and Older Adults with Hearing Loss, Users or not of Hearing Aids: A Meta-Analysis

Ana Carla Garcia, Jéssica Raignieri, Carolina Lamonica Batista Marques, Glória Cortz Ravazzi et al.
Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
article

Cognitive Aspects of Adults and Older Adults with Hearing Loss, Users or not of Hearing Aids: A Meta-Analysis

Ana Carla Garcia, Jéssica Raignieri, Carolina Lamonica Batista Marques, Glória Cortz Ravazzi, Ana Cristina Guarinello, Kyla Munoz Galarza, Israel Bispo dos Santos, Everton Adriano de Morais, Amanda Monteiro Magrini, Giselle Massi, Adriana Lacerda
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate cognitive aspects in adults and older adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids, compared to those with hearing loss who do not use hearing aids. Research Strategies: A systematic search across seven databases and gray literature until May 10, 2022, sought studies of individuals aged >18 with hearing loss. Selection Criteria: Both interventional and observational analytical studies were included, without language or publication date restrictions. Data Analysis: Seven articles were included, revealing a correlation between cognitive aspects, hearing loss, and hearing aid use in adults and older adults.Comparisons were made between hearing aid users and non-users usingvalidated cognitive questionnaires. Risk of bias assessment was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Assessment Checklist, followed by random effects meta-analysis. The GRADE tool determined certainty of evidence. Results: Hearing aid usersexhibited improved Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) performance (MD = -1.47; CI95% = -2.53 - - 0.40; I2 = 7.21%), albeit with low certainty. Conclusion: While MMSE results indicated possible cognitive benefits for adults and older adults using hearing aids, the evidence remains uncertain. Developing a comprehensive psychological assessment tool encompassing language, memory, attention, executive functions, and socialization is recommended to ensure accurate evaluations of this population’s health.

Global Journal of Human-Social Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.