Detonation Performance and Material Characterization of CL‐20 and MDNT Cocrystals Versus Physical Mixtures

ABSTRACT The difficulty of developing novel energetic materials has led researchers to a process known as cocrystallization. When applied to energetic materials, the technique produces a cocrystal that is formed using two known explosives to potentially gain the benefits of one or both without the drawbacks for a particular application. A comparison of cocrystals to a physical mixture of the same coformers can be considered. Cocrystals have unique material properties and crystal structures, whereas a physical mixture is just a mixed combination of the known materials at the same molar ratio. This study used photon Doppler velocimetry (PDV) to compare the particle velocity for 2,4,6,8,10,12‐hexanitro‐2,4,6,8,10,12‐hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL‐20) and 1‐methyl‐3,5‐dinitro‐1,2,4‐triazole (MDNT) at a 1:1 molar ratio for both a cocrystal and a physical mixture of the two energetic materials. This cocrystal was previously shown to detonate faster than a physical mixture. However, the PDV results here were not consistent with this result. In addition to measuring output particle velocity with PDV, the cocrystal was characterized to examine phase purity and possible signs of deterioration of the material over time. Evaluating the cocrystal with Fourier‐transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, bomb calorimetry, and powder x‐ray diffraction (PXRD) allowed for more accurate comparison and greater confidence in the particle velocity measurements obtained in these experiments. The most significant difference in the material characterization results was the difference in enthalpy of formation, as the material tested in this study had a substantially lower enthalpy of formation than previously measured for a CL‐20/MDNT cocrystal.