High capacity Impella, an effective mechanical support strategy for patients in cardiogenic shock bridged to heart transplantation

To the Editor, Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. However, over the past decade, waiting times for elective transplantation have increased, reaching a mean of 186 days, leading to clinical deterioration in these patients while awaiting an organ.1 Consequently, the use of temporary mechanical support devices has become a necessity. Although several options remain available, such as intra-aortic balloon pump, TandemHeart (CardiacAssist, United States), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the use of temporary percutaneous devices is on the rise.2 One of these temporary percutaneous devices, the Impella CP, has already been successfully utilized for this purpose.3,4 Although there are several versions of the Impella device (2.5, CP, 5.0) each with its own limitations, the recently introduced 5.5 offers advantages, such as high flow, an average support duration of 1 month, and axillary implantation. The emergence of the new high-flow axillary Impella devices—5.0 and 5.5—with a CE-marked duration of up to 1 month and their equivalence to surgical assist devices requiring sternotomy, such as Levitronix (Switzerland), in terms of emergency criteria for organ allocation, minimizing associated morbidity, has changed the landscape of emergency heart transplantation.5 Several experiences using the Impella 5.5 strategy for temporary mechanical support...

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
REC interventional cardiology (English Edition)
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24875/recice.m25000501
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High capacity Impella, an effective mechanical support strategy for patients in cardiogenic shock bridged to heart transplantation

Ignacio Jesus Amat-Santos, Juan Bustamante Munguira, Javier Tobar Ruiz, and Alexander Stepanenko et al.
REC interventional cardiology (English Edition)
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

High capacity Impella, an effective mechanical support strategy for patients in cardiogenic shock bridged to heart transplantation

Ignacio Jesus Amat-Santos, Juan Bustamante Munguira, Javier Tobar Ruiz, and Alexander Stepanenko, María Plaza Martín, Adrián Lozano Ibáñez
article en

Abstract

To the Editor, Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for patients with advanced heart failure. However, over the past decade, waiting times for elective transplantation have increased, reaching a mean of 186 days, leading to clinical deterioration in these patients while awaiting an organ.1 Consequently, the use of temporary mechanical support devices has become a necessity. Although several options remain available, such as intra-aortic balloon pump, TandemHeart (CardiacAssist, United States), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the use of temporary percutaneous devices is on the rise.2 One of these temporary percutaneous devices, the Impella CP, has already been successfully utilized for this purpose.3,4 Although there are several versions of the Impella device (2.5, CP, 5.0) each with its own limitations, the recently introduced 5.5 offers advantages, such as high flow, an average support duration of 1 month, and axillary implantation. The emergence of the new high-flow axillary Impella devices—5.0 and 5.5—with a CE-marked duration of up to 1 month and their equivalence to surgical assist devices requiring sternotomy, such as Levitronix (Switzerland), in terms of emergency criteria for organ allocation, minimizing associated morbidity, has changed the landscape of emergency heart transplantation.5 Several experiences using the Impella 5.5 strategy for temporary mechanical support...

REC interventional cardiology (English Edition)Vol. 7(3)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.