Hydrological Effects of Bioretention Facilities in an Environment with a High Groundwater Table and Their Impacts on Groundwater

With urbanization accelerating, low-impact development (LID) facilities, particularly bioretention facilities, play a crucial role in urban water management. However, rising groundwater tables present challenges for their application in high-water-table areas. This study experimentally evaluated the impact of shallow groundwater tables on the hydrological performance of bioretention facilities. The experiment was designed to evaluate the effects of different groundwater table levels, soil media types, runoff ratios, and rainfall characteristics on hydrological responses. It also examined their impact on drainage pipe design and groundwater recharge. Results showed that as the groundwater table rose from 0.2 m to 0.5 m, the drainage pipe discharge increased (Facility #1: 52%→76%, Facility #3: 31%→58%) while the groundwater recharge decreased (Facility #1: 44%→17%, Facility #3: 63%→39%). This indicates that a higher groundwater table intensifies the diversion effect of the drainage pipe, increasing the proportion of stormwater discharged while reducing the proportion infiltrating to recharge the groundwater. Under moderate to heavy rainfall, sandy loam reduced the drainage time by 41–43% and increased the groundwater recharge by up to 80%. Without drainage pipes, sandy loam enhanced the recharge rates (α = 0.87), and #3 exhibited superior infiltration. Rainfall intensity and interval significantly influenced the hydrological performance.