An Evaluation of Physicians' and Pharmacists' Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours About Pharmacovigilance: Cross-Sectional Study

Objective: As defined by the World Health Organization, pharmacovigilance encompasses the scientific and operational aspects of detecting, evaluating, understanding and preventing adverse effects and other problems associated with medicines. The aim of this study, conducted between March and April 2024, was to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of physicians and pharmacists in Türkiye regarding pharmacovigilance, reporting and follow-up of an adverse drug reaction (ADR). Material and Methods: The survey questions were developed through a process of reviewing and adapting those used in similar studies. Results: A total of 101 doctors and 101 pharmacists participated in the study. The proportion of pharmacists trained in reporting ADRs is significantly higher than that of physicians (p<0.001). Most of the participants surveyed believed that they were responsible for reporting ADRs. However, at 12.9% for doctors and 50.5% for pharmacists, the proportion of participants who had experienced and reported such reactions was relatively low. A higher proportion of pharmacists than of doctors believed that there would be no consequences if they failed to report an ADR (p<0.001). In 2023, a total of 32 participants reported ADRs. Almost all participants considered pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting to be important and that detailed pharmacovigilance training should be provided to healthcare workers. It was observed that doctors and pharmacists in this survey had a limited understanding of pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting. Conclusion: The results indicate that participants are open to receiving training on monitoring and reporting ADRs, will take the training seriously, and will report ADRs when adequately informed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Literature Pharmacy Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5336/pharmsci.2024-105678
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evaluation of Physicians' and Pharmacists' Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours About Pharmacovigilance: Cross-Sectional Study

Emre Kara, S. Yıldırım, Özgenur GERİDÖNMEZ
Journal of Literature Pharmacy Sciences
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

An Evaluation of Physicians' and Pharmacists' Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours About Pharmacovigilance: Cross-Sectional Study

Emre Kara, S. Yıldırım, Özgenur GERİDÖNMEZ
article en

Abstract

Objective: As defined by the World Health Organization, pharmacovigilance encompasses the scientific and operational aspects of detecting, evaluating, understanding and preventing adverse effects and other problems associated with medicines. The aim of this study, conducted between March and April 2024, was to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of physicians and pharmacists in Türkiye regarding pharmacovigilance, reporting and follow-up of an adverse drug reaction (ADR). Material and Methods: The survey questions were developed through a process of reviewing and adapting those used in similar studies. Results: A total of 101 doctors and 101 pharmacists participated in the study. The proportion of pharmacists trained in reporting ADRs is significantly higher than that of physicians (p<0.001). Most of the participants surveyed believed that they were responsible for reporting ADRs. However, at 12.9% for doctors and 50.5% for pharmacists, the proportion of participants who had experienced and reported such reactions was relatively low. A higher proportion of pharmacists than of doctors believed that there would be no consequences if they failed to report an ADR (p<0.001). In 2023, a total of 32 participants reported ADRs. Almost all participants considered pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting to be important and that detailed pharmacovigilance training should be provided to healthcare workers. It was observed that doctors and pharmacists in this survey had a limited understanding of pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting. Conclusion: The results indicate that participants are open to receiving training on monitoring and reporting ADRs, will take the training seriously, and will report ADRs when adequately informed.

Journal of Literature Pharmacy SciencesVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.