The broadcasting trap: TikTok and the “democratization” of digital content production

Social media and digital production tools have provided a big impulse to the possibility of a democratization of content production. However, enhanced viability does not imply an actual capacity to tap into the opportunity. Research on social media participation shows that content production, and especially the most popular content, is mostly driven by a small elite of super-users, and an additional but still small share of content creators. In this paper, we wonder whether a more recent social media such as TikTok, whose design features are optimized to facilitate content production and to enhance visibility of content from unknown users, actually makes a difference in this regard. To do so, we analyzed the production and networking patterns observed on a large database of 24,992,678 videos posted by 6,973,120 unique users on TikTok between October 2014 and December 2019. We find that in TikTok, the implicit operational logic is that of broadcasting. To spark a real democratization in digital content production, it is necessary to overcome this model and to embrace more radical forms of production and distribution, most notably intrinsically collective forms of online creation. Insofar as content production reflects a broadcasting logic, no targeted changes in the design features are likely to substantially affect the patterns of active participation in social media such as TikTok.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04797-w
Citations
7
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The broadcasting trap: TikTok and the “democratization” of digital content production

Pier Luigi Sacco, Federico Pilati, Oriol Artime, Matteo Scianna
7 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
15.99
article

The broadcasting trap: TikTok and the “democratization” of digital content production

Pier Luigi Sacco, Federico Pilati, Oriol Artime, Matteo Scianna
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Social media and digital production tools have provided a big impulse to the possibility of a democratization of content production. However, enhanced viability does not imply an actual capacity to tap into the opportunity. Research on social media participation shows that content production, and especially the most popular content, is mostly driven by a small elite of super-users, and an additional but still small share of content creators. In this paper, we wonder whether a more recent social media such as TikTok, whose design features are optimized to facilitate content production and to enhance visibility of content from unknown users, actually makes a difference in this regard. To do so, we analyzed the production and networking patterns observed on a large database of 24,992,678 videos posted by 6,973,120 unique users on TikTok between October 2014 and December 2019. We find that in TikTok, the implicit operational logic is that of broadcasting. To spark a real democratization in digital content production, it is necessary to overcome this model and to embrace more radical forms of production and distribution, most notably intrinsically collective forms of online creation. Insofar as content production reflects a broadcasting logic, no targeted changes in the design features are likely to substantially affect the patterns of active participation in social media such as TikTok.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of Geneva (CH), University of Trento (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
15.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.