Risk-aware decisions: Taking into account admissible risk and measurement uncertainty in setting the acceptance limits

Document JCGM 106:2012, encompassed in the ISO-IEC Guide 98-4, provides guidelines for comparing a measurement result with a tolerance interval, considering that, according to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), a measurement result is not a single value but rather a distribution of values. Therefore, the comparison does not always lead to a fully certain decision. In fact, when the distribution crosses the tolerance limits, there is a risk of making an incorrect decision. JCGM 106:2012 offers general recommendations about setting acceptance or rejection limits, without providing details on how to compute them under practical situations. This paper addresses most practical situations, considering cases of normal and non-normal distributions and cases where the distribution of values that can be reasonably be attributed to the measurand are obtained through Monte Carlo simulations. Additionally, it allows for considering any desired level of decision risk, which can be set based on the specific situation or application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPJ Web of Conferences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202532314002
Primary Topic
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk-aware decisions: Taking into account admissible risk and measurement uncertainty in setting the acceptance limits

Harsha Vardhana Jetti, Sina Ronaghi, Alessandro Ferrero, Simona Salicone
EPJ Web of Conferences
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
article

Risk-aware decisions: Taking into account admissible risk and measurement uncertainty in setting the acceptance limits

Harsha Vardhana Jetti, Sina Ronaghi, Alessandro Ferrero, Simona Salicone
article en

Abstract

Document JCGM 106:2012, encompassed in the ISO-IEC Guide 98-4, provides guidelines for comparing a measurement result with a tolerance interval, considering that, according to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), a measurement result is not a single value but rather a distribution of values. Therefore, the comparison does not always lead to a fully certain decision. In fact, when the distribution crosses the tolerance limits, there is a risk of making an incorrect decision. JCGM 106:2012 offers general recommendations about setting acceptance or rejection limits, without providing details on how to compute them under practical situations. This paper addresses most practical situations, considering cases of normal and non-normal distributions and cases where the distribution of values that can be reasonably be attributed to the measurand are obtained through Monte Carlo simulations. Additionally, it allows for considering any desired level of decision risk, which can be set based on the specific situation or application.

EPJ Web of ConferencesVol. 323
University of Perugia (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.