An Immediate Study on Twitter Reactions to Roe v. Wades Overturning: A Digital Feminism Perspective

Reversal of the Roe v. Wade decision has prompted a surge in digital activism and public discourse on Twitter. This study utilizes MDCoR to analyze tweets, developing an immediate study with the #RoeVsWade hashtag following the Supreme Court's decision. The analysis reveals two predominant themes: abortion as a healthcare issue and abortion as a legal right. The first theme focuses on personal narratives and the medical necessity of abortion, while the second addresses the political and legal dimensions of reproductive rights. Sentiment analysis of the tweets indicates neutral to positive emotions in discussions around healthcare, with a more objective tone. Meanwhile, tweets concerning legal rights exhibit stronger subjectivity and emotional content, reflecting the deep ideological divides. The study underscores the vital role of online platforms in shaping public opinion and collective movements, providing insights into feminist activism trends in the digital age and their effect on social change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Humanities Research
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2024.21745
Primary Topic
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Immediate Study on Twitter Reactions to Roe v. Wades Overturning: A Digital Feminism Perspective

Jun Yang
Communications in Humanities Research
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
article

An Immediate Study on Twitter Reactions to Roe v. Wades Overturning: A Digital Feminism Perspective

Jun Yang
article en

Abstract

Reversal of the Roe v. Wade decision has prompted a surge in digital activism and public discourse on Twitter. This study utilizes MDCoR to analyze tweets, developing an immediate study with the #RoeVsWade hashtag following the Supreme Court's decision. The analysis reveals two predominant themes: abortion as a healthcare issue and abortion as a legal right. The first theme focuses on personal narratives and the medical necessity of abortion, while the second addresses the political and legal dimensions of reproductive rights. Sentiment analysis of the tweets indicates neutral to positive emotions in discussions around healthcare, with a more objective tone. Meanwhile, tweets concerning legal rights exhibit stronger subjectivity and emotional content, reflecting the deep ideological divides. The study underscores the vital role of online platforms in shaping public opinion and collective movements, providing insights into feminist activism trends in the digital age and their effect on social change.

Communications in Humanities ResearchVol. 55(1)
East China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Law, Rights, and Freedoms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.