Collaborative diffusion: The dynamics of policy output in <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 interstate compacts

Abstract Interstate compacts are formal structures through which multiple states work together towards a common goal or shared agenda. Previous research on compacts focuses almost exclusively on the decision to join the compact, leaving questions on post‐formation diffusion patterns unexplored. We use a unique case of three interstate compacts that form simultaneously around the same issue—the COVID‐19 pandemic—to test how policy diffuses within compacts. We employ a novel diffusion methodology, network event history analysis (NEHA), to determine the role of compact membership in policy activity. We find that compact member states are no more active in adopting policy than non‐members, but that non‐member states use compacts to free ride when making their own adoption choices. We find that compacts serve to establish members as leaders, as non‐members' policy adoptions are strongly driven by the adoptions of compact members. We also find COVID‐19 policy diffusion to be strongly driven by state ideology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Studies Journal
Published
2025-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.70008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative diffusion: The dynamics of policy output in COVID ‐19 interstate compacts

Frederick J. Boehmke, Johabed G. Olvera, Isaac Pollert, Jeffrey J. Harden et al.
1 citations
Policy Studies Journal
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
article

Collaborative diffusion: The dynamics of policy output in COVID ‐19 interstate compacts

Frederick J. Boehmke, Johabed G. Olvera, Isaac Pollert, Jeffrey J. Harden, Bruce Desmarais
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Interstate compacts are formal structures through which multiple states work together towards a common goal or shared agenda. Previous research on compacts focuses almost exclusively on the decision to join the compact, leaving questions on post‐formation diffusion patterns unexplored. We use a unique case of three interstate compacts that form simultaneously around the same issue—the COVID‐19 pandemic—to test how policy diffuses within compacts. We employ a novel diffusion methodology, network event history analysis (NEHA), to determine the role of compact membership in policy activity. We find that compact member states are no more active in adopting policy than non‐members, but that non‐member states use compacts to free ride when making their own adoption choices. We find that compacts serve to establish members as leaders, as non‐members' policy adoptions are strongly driven by the adoptions of compact members. We also find COVID‐19 policy diffusion to be strongly driven by state ideology.

Policy Studies JournalVol. 53(4)
University of Notre Dame (US), University of Iowa (US), Pennsylvania State University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Policy Transfer and Learning
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Collaborative diffusion: The dynamics of policy output in <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 interstate compacts — Frederick J. Boehmke, Johabed G. Olvera, et al. · Policy Studies Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS