Physiological and Psychological Resilience Among Healthcare Workers in <scp>COVID</scp>–19 Units—The Protective Role of Religious Beliefs

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted global health, with disproportionate consequences for healthcare workers (HCWs). Religious beliefs and practices may improve psychological resilience by fostering community, providing purpose and giving meaning to hardships. Yet, how religiosity impacts HCWs during a time of crisis is unclear. We therefore performed a cross-sectional study to investigate how religiosity contributes to resilience among HCWs who were routinely exposed to high levels of stress during the pandemic, through a physiological measure (the Auditory Sustained Attention Test; ASAT) and psychological self-reports. Forty-two HCWs were recruited from COVID-19 units and 44 HCWs from general internal medicine units during June and July 2022. COVID-19 HCWs showed significantly elevated emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT, as measured by acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition, that was undetectable with self-reports. Furthermore, after dividing the HCWs into a 'high' and 'low' religiosity group, those in the 'low' group showed higher emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT. Findings suggest that the ASAT has greater sensitivity at detecting emotional and attentional dysregulations than self-reports. Moderate or high religiosity may lead to better performance on the ASAT which could suggest greater resilience to mental health problems in the face of a crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Psychology
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70047
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physiological and Psychological Resilience Among Healthcare Workers in COVID–19 Units—The Protective Role of Religious Beliefs

Boaz Bloch, Einat Mader, Janne L. Punski‐Hoogervorst, Avi Avital et al.
International Journal of Psychology
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Physiological and Psychological Resilience Among Healthcare Workers in COVID–19 Units—The Protective Role of Religious Beliefs

Boaz Bloch, Einat Mader, Janne L. Punski‐Hoogervorst, Avi Avital, Aaron Pinkhasov, Morgan R. Peltier, Hernan Kosovsky
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted global health, with disproportionate consequences for healthcare workers (HCWs). Religious beliefs and practices may improve psychological resilience by fostering community, providing purpose and giving meaning to hardships. Yet, how religiosity impacts HCWs during a time of crisis is unclear. We therefore performed a cross-sectional study to investigate how religiosity contributes to resilience among HCWs who were routinely exposed to high levels of stress during the pandemic, through a physiological measure (the Auditory Sustained Attention Test; ASAT) and psychological self-reports. Forty-two HCWs were recruited from COVID-19 units and 44 HCWs from general internal medicine units during June and July 2022. COVID-19 HCWs showed significantly elevated emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT, as measured by acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition, that was undetectable with self-reports. Furthermore, after dividing the HCWs into a 'high' and 'low' religiosity group, those in the 'low' group showed higher emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT. Findings suggest that the ASAT has greater sensitivity at detecting emotional and attentional dysregulations than self-reports. Moderate or high religiosity may lead to better performance on the ASAT which could suggest greater resilience to mental health problems in the face of a crisis.

International Journal of PsychologyVol. 60(3)
Emek Medical Center (IL), Jersey Shore University Medical Center (US), University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.