Creating value, not waste: Ecosystem collaboration for take-back

A take-back system can reduce the usage of virgin natural resources by reusing discarded products. However, if actors in the take-back system treat the discarded products as waste, the reuse value potential is lost. A situation that negatively impacts the sustainability and financial performance of the take-back system. The study explores the reuse of discarded white goods using data from multiple take-back value streams for discarded white goods. This is not an ideal case of a take-back system but rather a case showing some of the challenges in creating an efficient one. The study identifies interest alignment between collaborating actors as a key condition for maximizing the recoverability of discarded products, capturing value, and reducing value loss. Additionally, information asymmetry impacts value loss and financial performance. The study proposes introducing governance mechanisms and leads firm initiatives to promote conditions conducive to ecosystem actor alignment. An effective take-back system usually requires a lead firm - an orchestrator - responsible for the structure and performance of the take-back system, including governance, commercial arrangements, go-to-market coordination, value creation mechanisms, value sharing mechanisms, and risk management. • Resources are lost in take-back systems. • Treating products as waste instead of value results in excessive damage. • Actor behavior in the value stream must change to boost take-back value creation. • Information sharing reduces operations costs for a reuse process. • Proposed governance mechanisms are contracts specifying conditions for reuse and lead firm initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100268
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating value, not waste: Ecosystem collaboration for take-back

Torben Pedersen, Rasmus Jørgensen, Johan Lilja, Christer Hedlund
1 citations
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
2.23
article

Creating value, not waste: Ecosystem collaboration for take-back

Torben Pedersen, Rasmus Jørgensen, Johan Lilja, Christer Hedlund
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A take-back system can reduce the usage of virgin natural resources by reusing discarded products. However, if actors in the take-back system treat the discarded products as waste, the reuse value potential is lost. A situation that negatively impacts the sustainability and financial performance of the take-back system. The study explores the reuse of discarded white goods using data from multiple take-back value streams for discarded white goods. This is not an ideal case of a take-back system but rather a case showing some of the challenges in creating an efficient one. The study identifies interest alignment between collaborating actors as a key condition for maximizing the recoverability of discarded products, capturing value, and reducing value loss. Additionally, information asymmetry impacts value loss and financial performance. The study proposes introducing governance mechanisms and leads firm initiatives to promote conditions conducive to ecosystem actor alignment. An effective take-back system usually requires a lead firm - an orchestrator - responsible for the structure and performance of the take-back system, including governance, commercial arrangements, go-to-market coordination, value creation mechanisms, value sharing mechanisms, and risk management. • Resources are lost in take-back systems. • Treating products as waste instead of value results in excessive damage. • Actor behavior in the value stream must change to boost take-back value creation. • Information sharing reduces operations costs for a reuse process. • Proposed governance mechanisms are contracts specifying conditions for reuse and lead firm initiatives.

Cleaner Environmental SystemsVol. 17
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Quality of Life Research Center (DK)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creating value, not waste: Ecosystem collaboration for take-back — Torben Pedersen, Rasmus Jørgensen, et al. · Cleaner Environmental Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS