You’ve Got the Wrong Number: Evaluating Deep Learning Training Paradigms Using Handwritten Digit Recognition Data

To build more accurate and trustworthy artificial intelligence algorithms in deep learning, it is essential to understand the mechanisms driving classification systems to identify their targets. Typically, post hoc methods provide insights into this process. In this preliminary work, we shift the reconstruction of the class activation map to the training phase to evaluate how the model’s performance changes compared to standard classification approaches. The Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology dataset and its variants, such as Fashion Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology, consist of well-defined images that facilitate testing this type of training process. Specifically, the classification targets are the only significant content in the images, excluding the background, allowing for a direct comparison of the reconstruction against the input images. To enhance the guidance of the network, we introduce a contrastive loss term to complement the standard classification function, which often uses categorical cross-entropy. By comparing the accuracy and the extracted pattern of the standard approach with the proposed method, we can gain valuable insights into the network’s learning process. This approach aims to improve the interpretability and effectiveness of the model during training, ultimately leading to higher classification accuracy and reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1054661824700974
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You’ve Got the Wrong Number: Evaluating Deep Learning Training Paradigms Using Handwritten Digit Recognition Data

Massimo Martinelli, Giacomo Ignesti, Davide Moroni
1 citations
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis
Advanced Neural Network Applications
0.25
article

You’ve Got the Wrong Number: Evaluating Deep Learning Training Paradigms Using Handwritten Digit Recognition Data

Massimo Martinelli, Giacomo Ignesti, Davide Moroni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To build more accurate and trustworthy artificial intelligence algorithms in deep learning, it is essential to understand the mechanisms driving classification systems to identify their targets. Typically, post hoc methods provide insights into this process. In this preliminary work, we shift the reconstruction of the class activation map to the training phase to evaluate how the model’s performance changes compared to standard classification approaches. The Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology dataset and its variants, such as Fashion Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology, consist of well-defined images that facilitate testing this type of training process. Specifically, the classification targets are the only significant content in the images, excluding the background, allowing for a direct comparison of the reconstruction against the input images. To enhance the guidance of the network, we introduce a contrastive loss term to complement the standard classification function, which often uses categorical cross-entropy. By comparing the accuracy and the extracted pattern of the standard approach with the proposed method, we can gain valuable insights into the network’s learning process. This approach aims to improve the interpretability and effectiveness of the model during training, ultimately leading to higher classification accuracy and reliability.

Pattern Recognition and Image AnalysisVol. 34(4)
University of Pisa (IT), Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" (IT), National Research Council (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Advanced Neural Network Applications
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.