Pathways to Turbulent Dissipation in a Submarine Canyon

Abstract Velocity and turbulence observations are used to estimate the forward cascade of kinetic energy from the internal tide to dissipation within a steep canyon. Two methods for computing cross‐frequency kinetic energy flux are compared to observed dissipation. One method, coarse graining, allows strongly nonlinear dynamics while the other assumes weak nonlinearity. Fluxes from both methods agree within a factor of 3 with dissipation estimates from a finescale parameterization which is often used in climate‐scale ocean models. Coarse graining predicts 68% of energy fluxing to dissipation from frequencies lower than 8cpd, while the weakly nonlinear method predicts 34%. The weighting of energy flux toward lower frequencies supports a shorter frequency‐space pathway to dissipation in the presence of topographic wave breaking than assumed by parameterizations. Enhanced near‐boundary mixing and upwelling has implications for the rate and spatial distribution of the upwelling branch of the global overturning circulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl113526
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pathways to Turbulent Dissipation in a Submarine Canyon

Alberto C. Naveira Garabato, Bethan Wynne‐Cattanach, Giovanni Dematteis, Matthew H. Alford et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
article

Pathways to Turbulent Dissipation in a Submarine Canyon

Alberto C. Naveira Garabato, Bethan Wynne‐Cattanach, Giovanni Dematteis, Matthew H. Alford, Gunnar Voet, Nicole Couto, Charlotte Bellerjeau, Arnaud Le Boyer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Velocity and turbulence observations are used to estimate the forward cascade of kinetic energy from the internal tide to dissipation within a steep canyon. Two methods for computing cross‐frequency kinetic energy flux are compared to observed dissipation. One method, coarse graining, allows strongly nonlinear dynamics while the other assumes weak nonlinearity. Fluxes from both methods agree within a factor of 3 with dissipation estimates from a finescale parameterization which is often used in climate‐scale ocean models. Coarse graining predicts 68% of energy fluxing to dissipation from frequencies lower than 8cpd, while the weakly nonlinear method predicts 34%. The weighting of energy flux toward lower frequencies supports a shorter frequency‐space pathway to dissipation in the presence of topographic wave breaking than assumed by parameterizations. Enhanced near‐boundary mixing and upwelling has implications for the rate and spatial distribution of the upwelling branch of the global overturning circulation.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(7)
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Southampton (GB), University of Turin (IT)
National Science Foundation, Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.