Worker Voice and Mutual Gains From Remote Performance Management: Evidence From Digitalized Services in North America and Germany

ABSTRACT The expansion of remote working arrangements has required managers to adjust their approach to managing performance, as they transition from in‐person to technology‐mediated tools and practices. Past research has identified negative worker impacts associated with intensified digital monitoring and discipline‐based coaching. However, few studies have investigated the antecedents of more worker‐friendly arrangements. This paper examines the role of collective worker voice in shaping remote work performance management choices, based on a comparative study of telecommunications call centers in Canada, the United States, and Germany. Findings suggest that strong collective voice, especially when backed by institutional power, fosters a balanced approach to remote performance management by constraining the intensity of electronic performance monitoring and use of disciplinary practices, as well as by supporting more developmental coaching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management Journal
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12601
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corporate Management and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Worker Voice and Mutual Gains From Remote Performance Management: Evidence From Digitalized Services in North America and Germany

Sean O’Brady, Jelena Starcevic, Virginia Doellgast
3 citations
Human Resource Management Journal
Corporate Management and Leadership
8.29
article

Worker Voice and Mutual Gains From Remote Performance Management: Evidence From Digitalized Services in North America and Germany

Sean O’Brady, Jelena Starcevic, Virginia Doellgast
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The expansion of remote working arrangements has required managers to adjust their approach to managing performance, as they transition from in‐person to technology‐mediated tools and practices. Past research has identified negative worker impacts associated with intensified digital monitoring and discipline‐based coaching. However, few studies have investigated the antecedents of more worker‐friendly arrangements. This paper examines the role of collective worker voice in shaping remote work performance management choices, based on a comparative study of telecommunications call centers in Canada, the United States, and Germany. Findings suggest that strong collective voice, especially when backed by institutional power, fosters a balanced approach to remote performance management by constraining the intensity of electronic performance monitoring and use of disciplinary practices, as well as by supporting more developmental coaching.

Human Resource Management JournalVol. 35(4)
Cornell University (US), McMaster University (CA)
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, McMaster University, Arts Research Board, McMaster University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Management and Leadership
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Worker Voice and Mutual Gains From Remote Performance Management: Evidence From Digitalized Services in North America and Germany — Sean O’Brady, Jelena Starcevic, et al. · Human Resource Management Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS