Land Security and Land Administration: Lessons Learned from Projects Management

A presentation of five land administration programs since the 1990s highlights the success and failure factors encountered. Each program is accompanied by references available on the web. The projects aim to link two components: a systematic inventory of land occupancy, i.e. a technical and social aspect, and the registration of related rights, i.e. a legal aspect. Official reports do not clearly mention the factors that have contributed to the results, which are classified as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Quality assurance systems are often weak or non-existent, leading to delays or blockages. Sometimes these deficiencies result from project management or local governance, without the donor’s involvement. The absence of appropriate governance can also be felt in properly selecting companies awarded tenders, good coordination of local components such as the Cadaster and Land Register or sometimes cost monitoring.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Management
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v25i2.7590
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land Security and Land Administration: Lessons Learned from Projects Management

Bernard Samoullier
American Journal of Management
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Land Security and Land Administration: Lessons Learned from Projects Management

Bernard Samoullier
article en

Abstract

A presentation of five land administration programs since the 1990s highlights the success and failure factors encountered. Each program is accompanied by references available on the web. The projects aim to link two components: a systematic inventory of land occupancy, i.e. a technical and social aspect, and the registration of related rights, i.e. a legal aspect. Official reports do not clearly mention the factors that have contributed to the results, which are classified as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Quality assurance systems are often weak or non-existent, leading to delays or blockages. Sometimes these deficiencies result from project management or local governance, without the donor’s involvement. The absence of appropriate governance can also be felt in properly selecting companies awarded tenders, good coordination of local components such as the Cadaster and Land Register or sometimes cost monitoring.

American Journal of ManagementVol. 25(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.