Integrating social risk screening in kidney disease care: Ethical considerations and approaches

Background: With the goal of advancing health equity, the US healthcare sector has expanded activities to identify and intervene in patients' experiences of social adversity, sometimes referred to as "social care."As social care is scaled, there is mounting pressure to assess the quality of these activities, compared to the quantity.Yet, no measure of patients' experiences with social care has been developed.Objective: We conducted foundational qualitative research to understand key aspects of patients' experiences of social care to be incorporated into a patient-reported quality measure.Methods: We recruited patients from across the U.S who (1) were aged 18 or older, (2) spoke either English or Spanish as their primary language, and (3) had an experience with social care in a clinical setting within the last 12 months.Using a semi-structured interview guide, we invited participants to describe their experiences and expectations related to social risk screening and social interventions, along with suggestions for improvement.We conducted a thematic qualitative analysis of interview transcripts using a mixed inductive-deductive coding approach.Results: 30 people participated in interviews (16 Englishspeaking; 14 Spanish-speaking).Participants emphasized the importance of their relationship with their social care provider (SCP); their experiences of social care were influenced by their SCP's verbal and non-verbal demonstrations of empathy, linguistic and cultural alignment, and length of the patient-SCP relationship.Participants also valued the extent to which the screening, follow-up, or resource attainment they received aligned with their priorities.Overall, these two aspects of social care were interconnected and patients placed varying levels of value upon each.Conclusion: Our interviews suggest that the relational component is as important-if not more to some patients-than the functional aspects of social care.These factors can directly inform both the delivery of social care and future patient-reported social care experience measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Services Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14566
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating social risk screening in kidney disease care: Ethical considerations and approaches

Na’amah Razon, Bethney Bonilla
Health Services Research
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
article

Integrating social risk screening in kidney disease care: Ethical considerations and approaches

Na’amah Razon, Bethney Bonilla
article en

Abstract

Background: With the goal of advancing health equity, the US healthcare sector has expanded activities to identify and intervene in patients' experiences of social adversity, sometimes referred to as "social care."As social care is scaled, there is mounting pressure to assess the quality of these activities, compared to the quantity.Yet, no measure of patients' experiences with social care has been developed.Objective: We conducted foundational qualitative research to understand key aspects of patients' experiences of social care to be incorporated into a patient-reported quality measure.Methods: We recruited patients from across the U.S who (1) were aged 18 or older, (2) spoke either English or Spanish as their primary language, and (3) had an experience with social care in a clinical setting within the last 12 months.Using a semi-structured interview guide, we invited participants to describe their experiences and expectations related to social risk screening and social interventions, along with suggestions for improvement.We conducted a thematic qualitative analysis of interview transcripts using a mixed inductive-deductive coding approach.Results: 30 people participated in interviews (16 Englishspeaking; 14 Spanish-speaking).Participants emphasized the importance of their relationship with their social care provider (SCP); their experiences of social care were influenced by their SCP's verbal and non-verbal demonstrations of empathy, linguistic and cultural alignment, and length of the patient-SCP relationship.Participants also valued the extent to which the screening, follow-up, or resource attainment they received aligned with their priorities.Overall, these two aspects of social care were interconnected and patients placed varying levels of value upon each.Conclusion: Our interviews suggest that the relational component is as important-if not more to some patients-than the functional aspects of social care.These factors can directly inform both the delivery of social care and future patient-reported social care experience measures.

Health Services ResearchVol. 60(S1)
University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.