Inquiry-Based Learning in Science: Mathematical Reasoning’s Support of Critical Thinking

The evolution of educational paradigms toward inquiry-based learning (IBL) in science education has significantly altered pedagogical practices by emphasizing the necessity of active student participation in the learning process. Through questioning, research, and problem-solving, IBL invites students to investigate scientific phenomena, so promoting a closer knowledge retention and understanding. Integral to this approach is the function of mathematical thinking, which functions not only as a tool for quantitative analysis but also as a basic framework for critical thinking. Mathematical reasoning helps students organize their searches, efficiently analyze data, and come to reasonable conclusions. This interaction improves their ability to link mathematical ideas and scientific concepts, developing more advanced higher-order thinking abilities. Understanding how mathematical reasoning supports critical thinking within IBL will help curriculum development and teaching strategies in science education be much more informed as education progressively prioritizes integrating multidisciplinary approaches. In science education especially, IBL is especially helpful since it fits very nicely with the Next Generation Science Standards, which support student-centered learning environments that advance critical thinking and teamwork. IBL helps students develop critical skills, including analytical thinking and reasoning, by pushing them to create their own questions and search for answers through investigation. Moreover, including mathematical reasoning in IBL improves students’ problem-solving capacity by letting them approach challenging scientific questions with a strong methodological framework. IBL thus not only fosters curiosity but also provides the cognitive tools required for advanced learning in scientific fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70232/jrmste.v2i1.35
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inquiry-Based Learning in Science: Mathematical Reasoning’s Support of Critical Thinking

Konstantinos Τ. Kotsis
4 citations
Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.
Education and Critical Thinking Development
35.70
article

Inquiry-Based Learning in Science: Mathematical Reasoning’s Support of Critical Thinking

Konstantinos Τ. Kotsis
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The evolution of educational paradigms toward inquiry-based learning (IBL) in science education has significantly altered pedagogical practices by emphasizing the necessity of active student participation in the learning process. Through questioning, research, and problem-solving, IBL invites students to investigate scientific phenomena, so promoting a closer knowledge retention and understanding. Integral to this approach is the function of mathematical thinking, which functions not only as a tool for quantitative analysis but also as a basic framework for critical thinking. Mathematical reasoning helps students organize their searches, efficiently analyze data, and come to reasonable conclusions. This interaction improves their ability to link mathematical ideas and scientific concepts, developing more advanced higher-order thinking abilities. Understanding how mathematical reasoning supports critical thinking within IBL will help curriculum development and teaching strategies in science education be much more informed as education progressively prioritizes integrating multidisciplinary approaches. In science education especially, IBL is especially helpful since it fits very nicely with the Next Generation Science Standards, which support student-centered learning environments that advance critical thinking and teamwork. IBL helps students develop critical skills, including analytical thinking and reasoning, by pushing them to create their own questions and search for answers through investigation. Moreover, including mathematical reasoning in IBL improves students’ problem-solving capacity by letting them approach challenging scientific questions with a strong methodological framework. IBL thus not only fosters curiosity but also provides the cognitive tools required for advanced learning in scientific fields.

Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education.Vol. 2(1)
University of Ioannina (GR)
University of Ioannina
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
35.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inquiry-Based Learning in Science: Mathematical Reasoning’s Support of Critical Thinking — Konstantinos Τ. Kotsis · Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS