Cost of capital for renewables and enabling technologies: Measuring the multidimensional heterogeneity in Switzerland

The cost of capital (CoC) is a critical parameter that significantly impacts the levelized costs of low-carbon energy technologies and cost-optimal decarbonization pathways. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on CoC differences between technologies and investor types is limited. Here, we study the heterogeneity among 11 technologies based on 193 CoC inputs from utilities, financial investors, and project developers in Switzerland. We find a wide range of CoC values across the technologies, averaging 3.6 % for small rooftop PV and 7.8 % for green hydrogen. Furthermore, we record an empirical variation of six percentage points even for assets of the same technology group, like solar PV, indicating differences between business models and investor types. Unlike neighboring countries that primarily rely on project finance for renewables, we find balance sheet financing to play an essential role for Swiss investors. Our results stress the need to differentiate CoC assumptions in energy system modeling and to consider not only technologies but also investor types and regional specificities as additional CoC dimensions. • We analyze the costs of capital (CoC) for eleven technology types in Switzerland. • The CoC range between 7.8 % for green hydrogen to 3.6 % for small scale rooftop PV. • Utilities have the lowest CoC, followed by financial investors and developers. • We show energy system analysts should differentiate CoC between technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125822
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost of capital for renewables and enabling technologies: Measuring the multidimensional heterogeneity in Switzerland

Mak Đukan, Bjarne Steffen
6 citations
Applied Energy
Climate Change Policy and Economics
18.79
article

Cost of capital for renewables and enabling technologies: Measuring the multidimensional heterogeneity in Switzerland

Mak Đukan, Bjarne Steffen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The cost of capital (CoC) is a critical parameter that significantly impacts the levelized costs of low-carbon energy technologies and cost-optimal decarbonization pathways. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on CoC differences between technologies and investor types is limited. Here, we study the heterogeneity among 11 technologies based on 193 CoC inputs from utilities, financial investors, and project developers in Switzerland. We find a wide range of CoC values across the technologies, averaging 3.6 % for small rooftop PV and 7.8 % for green hydrogen. Furthermore, we record an empirical variation of six percentage points even for assets of the same technology group, like solar PV, indicating differences between business models and investor types. Unlike neighboring countries that primarily rely on project finance for renewables, we find balance sheet financing to play an essential role for Swiss investors. Our results stress the need to differentiate CoC assumptions in energy system modeling and to consider not only technologies but also investor types and regional specificities as additional CoC dimensions. • We analyze the costs of capital (CoC) for eleven technology types in Switzerland. • The CoC range between 7.8 % for green hydrogen to 3.6 % for small scale rooftop PV. • Utilities have the lowest CoC, followed by financial investors and developers. • We show energy system analysts should differentiate CoC between technologies.

Applied EnergyVol. 390
ETH Zurich (CH)
Bundesamt für Energie
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.