Bridging the (structural) gap: HR practitioners as brokers of the space between academics and employee informants

Human resource (HR) practitioners are regularly contacted by academic researchers who seek access to interviewees and/or survey respondents within the HR practitioner’s organisation. However, despite interest in closing the research-practice gap, there has been limited consideration of the HR practitioner’s role in the conduct of organisational field research. To address this, we draw upon insights from the social networks literature on brokerage to propose that HR practitioners can function as research brokers —individuals behaving as intermediaries between internal and external organisational stakeholders to control or facilitate academic research activities. We integrate the literatures on network brokerage and boundary management strategies to develop a typology of HR practitioner brokering behaviours. We identify which conditions lend themselves to productive brokering that can facilitate the execution of research project partnerships. We outline challenges faced by HR practitioners in the research brokerage role and approaches for addressing these challenges. Finally, we identify opportunities for furthering the examination of research brokerage. • HR research brokers link organisational stakeholders to facilitate academic research. • We develop a typology of HR research brokering behaviours. • We link four specific forms of brokerage to first and second order outcomes. • We identify predictors of productive brokering that facilitate research studies. • We outline interventions to encourage alternative forms of research brokerage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management Review
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2025.101089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the (structural) gap: HR practitioners as brokers of the space between academics and employee informants

Hugh T. J. Bainbridge, Jessica R. Methot
1 citations
Human Resource Management Review
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
article

Bridging the (structural) gap: HR practitioners as brokers of the space between academics and employee informants

Hugh T. J. Bainbridge, Jessica R. Methot
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Human resource (HR) practitioners are regularly contacted by academic researchers who seek access to interviewees and/or survey respondents within the HR practitioner’s organisation. However, despite interest in closing the research-practice gap, there has been limited consideration of the HR practitioner’s role in the conduct of organisational field research. To address this, we draw upon insights from the social networks literature on brokerage to propose that HR practitioners can function as research brokers —individuals behaving as intermediaries between internal and external organisational stakeholders to control or facilitate academic research activities. We integrate the literatures on network brokerage and boundary management strategies to develop a typology of HR practitioner brokering behaviours. We identify which conditions lend themselves to productive brokering that can facilitate the execution of research project partnerships. We outline challenges faced by HR practitioners in the research brokerage role and approaches for addressing these challenges. Finally, we identify opportunities for furthering the examination of research brokerage. • HR research brokers link organisational stakeholders to facilitate academic research. • We develop a typology of HR research brokering behaviours. • We link four specific forms of brokerage to first and second order outcomes. • We identify predictors of productive brokering that facilitate research studies. • We outline interventions to encourage alternative forms of research brokerage.

Human Resource Management ReviewVol. 35(3)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Exeter (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Management and Organizational Studies
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.