Integrating social care in the EHR in an FQHC: Reach and equity 2 years post–integration

automated reporting, measurement, or tracking.Participants noted that use of structured fields such as dot phrases or procedures codes is increasing, but is not yet systematic or standardized, limiting this format's efficacy.Participants also reported substantial challenges with ascertaining referral status even if documentation used structured data, suggesting that such fields are not yet optimized for referral follow-up use.Regardless of documentation approach, participants noted that close partnerships with CBOs underlie referral success and emphasized the importance of documentation methods that promote these relationships.Conclusion: EHR tools for documentation among care teams addressing health-related social needs have not kept pace with the rise in such services.The experiences of those providing these services must inform the development of such tools, which will in turn support better care for patients with health-related social needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Services Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14526
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating social care in the EHR in an FQHC: Reach and equity 2 years post–integration

Alexander Azan, Isaac Dapkins, Jennifer M. Norton, Radhika Gore et al.
Health Services Research
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Integrating social care in the EHR in an FQHC: Reach and equity 2 years post–integration

Alexander Azan, Isaac Dapkins, Jennifer M. Norton, Radhika Gore, Lili Rodgers
article en

Abstract

automated reporting, measurement, or tracking.Participants noted that use of structured fields such as dot phrases or procedures codes is increasing, but is not yet systematic or standardized, limiting this format's efficacy.Participants also reported substantial challenges with ascertaining referral status even if documentation used structured data, suggesting that such fields are not yet optimized for referral follow-up use.Regardless of documentation approach, participants noted that close partnerships with CBOs underlie referral success and emphasized the importance of documentation methods that promote these relationships.Conclusion: EHR tools for documentation among care teams addressing health-related social needs have not kept pace with the rise in such services.The experiences of those providing these services must inform the development of such tools, which will in turn support better care for patients with health-related social needs.

Health Services ResearchVol. 60(S1)
Georgetown University (US), Lutheran Family Health Centers (US), New York University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating social care in the EHR in an FQHC: Reach and equity 2 years post–integration — Alexander Azan, Isaac Dapkins, et al. · Health Services Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS