The importance of role and setting in health system social determinants of health screening results

Background: Standards setting organizations are increasingly recommending screening for and addressing social drivers of health (SDOH) in clinical settings, leading to many health systems augmenting SDOH screening and referral protocols.Our healthcare system piloted SDOH screening and referral protocols using findhelp, an electronic social resource and referral platform, in 8 clinical settings.We then performed an implementation evaluation.Objective: To understand the reach, efficacy, and adoption of SDOH screening and referral protocols using findhelp, as well as attitudes about the implementation process, in multiple clinical settings.Methods: Eight clinical sites within a single healthcare system developed protocols for screening for and providing resources to address one or multiple SDOH.We surveyed staff at baseline and roughly 8 months after protocol implementation about their experiences and conducted interviews and focus groups with pilot site leaders and staff.We calculated descriptive statistics and performed rapid qualitative analysis.Results: Baseline screening rates varied by site and screening domain; most sites screened < 5% of patients.After implementation, nearly all screening rates improved.Of 187 staff surveyed, 95% supported efforts to assess and address SDOH.The most cited barrier to screening at baseline was time needed to screen (80%), which decreased to 71% at follow-up.The most cited facilitator of screening was comfort in asking (28%).Among those making referrals, support for using findhelp decreased from 71% to 67% from baseline to follow-up.Agreement that SDOH screening and referrals contribute to burnout increased from 27% to 31% and decreased from 20% to 16%, respectively, from baseline to follow-up. Conclusion:Implementing SDOH screening and referral protocols improved screening rates for most clinical sites, with variation by site and SDOH domain.There was broad support for SDOH screening and minimal change in rates of protocol barriers and facilitators cited and burnout between baseline and follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Services Research
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14490
Primary Topic
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The importance of role and setting in health system social determinants of health screening results

Dana M. Parke, Emily Morrow, Stephanie A. Robinson, Clifton D. Fuller et al.
Health Services Research
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
article

The importance of role and setting in health system social determinants of health screening results

Dana M. Parke, Emily Morrow, Stephanie A. Robinson, Clifton D. Fuller, Jaye Clement, Kimberlydawn Wisdom
article en

Abstract

Background: Standards setting organizations are increasingly recommending screening for and addressing social drivers of health (SDOH) in clinical settings, leading to many health systems augmenting SDOH screening and referral protocols.Our healthcare system piloted SDOH screening and referral protocols using findhelp, an electronic social resource and referral platform, in 8 clinical settings.We then performed an implementation evaluation.Objective: To understand the reach, efficacy, and adoption of SDOH screening and referral protocols using findhelp, as well as attitudes about the implementation process, in multiple clinical settings.Methods: Eight clinical sites within a single healthcare system developed protocols for screening for and providing resources to address one or multiple SDOH.We surveyed staff at baseline and roughly 8 months after protocol implementation about their experiences and conducted interviews and focus groups with pilot site leaders and staff.We calculated descriptive statistics and performed rapid qualitative analysis.Results: Baseline screening rates varied by site and screening domain; most sites screened < 5% of patients.After implementation, nearly all screening rates improved.Of 187 staff surveyed, 95% supported efforts to assess and address SDOH.The most cited barrier to screening at baseline was time needed to screen (80%), which decreased to 71% at follow-up.The most cited facilitator of screening was comfort in asking (28%).Among those making referrals, support for using findhelp decreased from 71% to 67% from baseline to follow-up.Agreement that SDOH screening and referrals contribute to burnout increased from 27% to 31% and decreased from 20% to 16%, respectively, from baseline to follow-up. Conclusion:Implementing SDOH screening and referral protocols improved screening rates for most clinical sites, with variation by site and SDOH domain.There was broad support for SDOH screening and minimal change in rates of protocol barriers and facilitators cited and burnout between baseline and follow-up.

Health Services ResearchVol. 60(S1)
Henry Ford Health System (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.