Medicalizing aesthetics or beautifying illness? Exploring the absence of diagnosis and the centrality of patient autonomy in dermatology

The moment of diagnosis is often regarded as a cornerstone of clinical practice and patienthood. It has mainly been viewed as preceding, and hence profoundly shaping, patients’ constructions of health and illness. However, amidst a rise in patient autonomy, the significance of a diagnosis as the starting point for care and patient identity is diminishing. This shift is particularly evident in dermatology due to its visual nature, the prevalence of alternative experts (e.g., cosmetologists, skincare gurus), and the intersection between its biomedical and cosmetic features. Against this backdrop, our study aims to reconsider the position of diagnosis in the dermatological context by raising the following questions: how is a dermatological condition socially constructed and therapeutically approached by patients, and what role does a diagnosis play? To address these questions, we thematically analyzed in-depth interviews with a heterogeneous sample of culturally diverse subjects diagnosed with seven distinct skin and hair conditions. Our findings reveal that the diagnostic moment is often absent in dermatological settings; instead, multiple agencies contribute to a dermatological diagnosis, with patients, rather than physicians, as the central agency. We situate our results within the broader context of increasing patient autonomy and lay expertise, noting that while the pursuit of “optimal” well-being is justified in the name of health, some skin and hair diseases are minimized, beautified, or embraced in the form of skin positivity. • The diagnostic moment is often absent in dermatological settings. • Multiple agencies contribute to the dermatological diagnostic process. • Patient autonomy drives the pursuit of well-being beyond pure health. • Dermatology’s biomedical-aesthetic features challenge traditional diagnostic models. • The role of alternative experts blurs the boundaries of dermatological practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Published
2025-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100551
Primary Topic
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medicalizing aesthetics or beautifying illness? Exploring the absence of diagnosis and the centrality of patient autonomy in dermatology

Dino Numerato, Dana Alsaialy
SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
article

Medicalizing aesthetics or beautifying illness? Exploring the absence of diagnosis and the centrality of patient autonomy in dermatology

Dino Numerato, Dana Alsaialy
article en

Abstract

The moment of diagnosis is often regarded as a cornerstone of clinical practice and patienthood. It has mainly been viewed as preceding, and hence profoundly shaping, patients’ constructions of health and illness. However, amidst a rise in patient autonomy, the significance of a diagnosis as the starting point for care and patient identity is diminishing. This shift is particularly evident in dermatology due to its visual nature, the prevalence of alternative experts (e.g., cosmetologists, skincare gurus), and the intersection between its biomedical and cosmetic features. Against this backdrop, our study aims to reconsider the position of diagnosis in the dermatological context by raising the following questions: how is a dermatological condition socially constructed and therapeutically approached by patients, and what role does a diagnosis play? To address these questions, we thematically analyzed in-depth interviews with a heterogeneous sample of culturally diverse subjects diagnosed with seven distinct skin and hair conditions. Our findings reveal that the diagnostic moment is often absent in dermatological settings; instead, multiple agencies contribute to a dermatological diagnosis, with patients, rather than physicians, as the central agency. We situate our results within the broader context of increasing patient autonomy and lay expertise, noting that while the pursuit of “optimal” well-being is justified in the name of health, some skin and hair diseases are minimized, beautified, or embraced in the form of skin positivity. • The diagnostic moment is often absent in dermatological settings. • Multiple agencies contribute to the dermatological diagnostic process. • Patient autonomy drives the pursuit of well-being beyond pure health. • Dermatology’s biomedical-aesthetic features challenge traditional diagnostic models. • The role of alternative experts blurs the boundaries of dermatological practice.

SSM - Qualitative Research in HealthVol. 7
Charles University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.