Talquetamab in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma, including BCMA-refractory

• Talquetamab showed similar responses and adverse event profile in this real-world cohort, including in patients ineligible for MonumenTAL-1. • Bispecific T-cell engager exposure and BDT immediately before and <6 months before talquetamab had poor outcomes. Talquetamab is a G protein–coupled receptor class C group 5 member D–targeting bispecific T-cell engager approved for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma based on the MonumenTAL-1 trial. In this retrospective study of 68 patients, we evaluated safety and efficacy of talquetamab in a real-world population across 7 US academic centers. We found that 40% of patients would have been ineligible for MonumenTAL-1 trial. Infections (29%) were far less common than in MonumenTAL-1 and with the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed therapies (BDTs). Cytopenias and unique toxicities of talquetamab such as dysgeusia (78%) were more frequent than in MonumenTAL-1, whereas other side effects were comparable. The best overall response rate (ORR) was 71%, with 51% very good partial response or better and 25% complete response or better. At a median follow-up of 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-17.5), estimated 6-month overall survival (OS) was 74% (95% CI, 59-85). On multivariate analysis, prior bispecific antibody exposure (hazard ratio [HR], 3.87; P = .01) and extramedullary disease (HR, 2.81; P < .01) were associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). In the BCMA-exposed group (n = 63), BDT immediately preceding talquetamab was associated with lower ORR (48% vs 81%; P ≤ .01) and shorter PFS (HR, 2.10; P = .04). Similarly, BDT within 6 months of talquetamab negatively affected ORR (57% vs 85%; P = .02), PFS (HR, 2.3; P = .03) and OS (HR, 4.8; P = .04). Overall, the safety and efficacy profile of talquetamab in this real-world data set are similar to that of the MonumenTAL-1 trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Immunology & Cellular Therapy
Published
2025-04-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bict.2025.100001
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Talquetamab in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma, including BCMA-refractory

Christopher Sun Strouse, Hamza Hashmi, Abdullah Khan, Gina Patrus et al.
5 citations
Blood Immunology & Cellular Therapy
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
8.85
article

Talquetamab in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma, including BCMA-refractory

Christopher Sun Strouse, Hamza Hashmi, Abdullah Khan, Gina Patrus, Andrew J. Vegel, Muhammad Umair Mushtaq, Shebli Atrash, Prerna Mewawalla, Mary K. McKenna, Bradley T. Loeffler, Yun Kyoung Tiger, Jordan Andrew Snyder, Barry Paul, Reed Friend, Kimberly M Green, Hira Ghazal Shaikh, Jonathan Lochner, Nausheen Ahmed, Rachel Dileo, Al-Ola Abdallah, Alma Habib
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Talquetamab showed similar responses and adverse event profile in this real-world cohort, including in patients ineligible for MonumenTAL-1. • Bispecific T-cell engager exposure and BDT immediately before and <6 months before talquetamab had poor outcomes. Talquetamab is a G protein–coupled receptor class C group 5 member D–targeting bispecific T-cell engager approved for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma based on the MonumenTAL-1 trial. In this retrospective study of 68 patients, we evaluated safety and efficacy of talquetamab in a real-world population across 7 US academic centers. We found that 40% of patients would have been ineligible for MonumenTAL-1 trial. Infections (29%) were far less common than in MonumenTAL-1 and with the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed therapies (BDTs). Cytopenias and unique toxicities of talquetamab such as dysgeusia (78%) were more frequent than in MonumenTAL-1, whereas other side effects were comparable. The best overall response rate (ORR) was 71%, with 51% very good partial response or better and 25% complete response or better. At a median follow-up of 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-17.5), estimated 6-month overall survival (OS) was 74% (95% CI, 59-85). On multivariate analysis, prior bispecific antibody exposure (hazard ratio [HR], 3.87; P = .01) and extramedullary disease (HR, 2.81; P < .01) were associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS). In the BCMA-exposed group (n = 63), BDT immediately preceding talquetamab was associated with lower ORR (48% vs 81%; P ≤ .01) and shorter PFS (HR, 2.10; P = .04). Similarly, BDT within 6 months of talquetamab negatively affected ORR (57% vs 85%; P = .02), PFS (HR, 2.3; P = .03) and OS (HR, 4.8; P = .04). Overall, the safety and efficacy profile of talquetamab in this real-world data set are similar to that of the MonumenTAL-1 trial.

Blood Immunology & Cellular TherapyVol. 1(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Allegheny Health Network (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Levine Cancer Institute (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), University of Iowa Health Care (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
8.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.