On the compressibility of large-scale source code datasets

Storing ultra-large amounts of unstructured data (often called objects or blobs) is a fundamental task for several object-based storage engines, data warehouses, data-lake systems, and key–value stores. These systems cannot currently leverage similarities between objects, which could be vital in improving their space and time performance. An important use case in which we can expect the objects to be highly similar is the storage of large-scale versioned source code datasets, such as the Software Heritage Archive (Di Cosmo and Zacchiroli, 2017). This use case is particularly interesting given the extraordinary size (1.5 PiB), the variegated nature, and the high repetitiveness of the at-issue corpus. In this paper we discuss and experiment with content- and context-based compression techniques for source-code collections that tailor known and novel tools to this setting in combination with state-of-the-art general-purpose compressors and the information coming from the Software Heritage Graph. We experiment with our compressors over a random sample of the entire corpus, and four large samples of source code files written in different popular languages: C/C ++ , Java, JavaScript, and Python. We also consider two scenarios of usage for our compressors, called Backup and File-Access scenario, where the latter adds to the former the support for single file retrieval. As a net result, our experiments show (i) how much “compressible” each language is, (ii) which content- or context-based techniques compress better and are faster to (de)compress by possibly supporting individual file access, and (iii) the ultimate compressed size that, according to our estimate, our best solution could achieve in storing all the source code written in these languages and available in the Software Heritage Archive: namely, in 3 TiB (down from their original 78 TiB total size, with an average compression ratio of 4%).