3E multi-objective optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle configurations for a geothermal off-grid system: Power, DHW, and hydrogen production

• This study optimizes an off-grid geothermal energy system for electrical load and DHW supply. • Three ORC configurations (basic ORC, ORC with reheater, regenerative ORC) were optimized. • The regenerative ORC (RORC) generating 44.45 % and 47.86 % more power than the basic ORC and RHORC, respectively. • RORC achieved the lowest LCOE and LCOH. • Energy and exergy efficiencies of RORC were 49.03 % and 47.01 %. This study investigates the optimization of an off-grid system for supplying electrical load and domestic hot water (DHW) to a building using geothermal energy. The system generates power through an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), with excess energy directed to an electrolyzer for hydrogen production. A residential complex in Tabriz, Iran, with 408 occupants, was selected as the case study, leveraging the availability of geothermal power. Three ORC configurations—basic ORC, ORC with reheater (RHORC), and regenerative ORC (RORC) were optimized in terms of energy, exergy, and economy. The optimization process utilized the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), aiming to maximize energy and exergy efficiency, hydrogen production, and minimize levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) and hydrogen (LCOH), while ensuring that electrical and DHW demands are met. The results demonstrate that the RORC configuration outperforms the other two cycles in all aspects: it produces 44.45 % more power than RHORC and 47.86 % more than ORC, with energy and exergy efficiencies of 49.03 % and 47.01 %, respectively. Furthermore, RORC generates significantly more hydrogen 63.81 % more than RHORC and 69.37 % more than ORC. Additionally, RORC has the lowest LCOE (4.52 cent. kWh −1 ) and LCOH (2.69 cent. kWh −1 ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101003
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3E multi-objective optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle configurations for a geothermal off-grid system: Power, DHW, and hydrogen production

Meisam Jalalvand, A.M. Mokhtari
3 citations
Energy Conversion and Management X
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
2.14
article

3E multi-objective optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle configurations for a geothermal off-grid system: Power, DHW, and hydrogen production

Meisam Jalalvand, A.M. Mokhtari
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• This study optimizes an off-grid geothermal energy system for electrical load and DHW supply. • Three ORC configurations (basic ORC, ORC with reheater, regenerative ORC) were optimized. • The regenerative ORC (RORC) generating 44.45 % and 47.86 % more power than the basic ORC and RHORC, respectively. • RORC achieved the lowest LCOE and LCOH. • Energy and exergy efficiencies of RORC were 49.03 % and 47.01 %. This study investigates the optimization of an off-grid system for supplying electrical load and domestic hot water (DHW) to a building using geothermal energy. The system generates power through an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), with excess energy directed to an electrolyzer for hydrogen production. A residential complex in Tabriz, Iran, with 408 occupants, was selected as the case study, leveraging the availability of geothermal power. Three ORC configurations—basic ORC, ORC with reheater (RHORC), and regenerative ORC (RORC) were optimized in terms of energy, exergy, and economy. The optimization process utilized the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), aiming to maximize energy and exergy efficiency, hydrogen production, and minimize levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) and hydrogen (LCOH), while ensuring that electrical and DHW demands are met. The results demonstrate that the RORC configuration outperforms the other two cycles in all aspects: it produces 44.45 % more power than RHORC and 47.86 % more than ORC, with energy and exergy efficiencies of 49.03 % and 47.01 %, respectively. Furthermore, RORC generates significantly more hydrogen 63.81 % more than RHORC and 69.37 % more than ORC. Additionally, RORC has the lowest LCOE (4.52 cent. kWh −1 ) and LCOH (2.69 cent. kWh −1 ).

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 26
Imam Hossein University (IR), Amirkabir University of Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.